Elucidation of soil-landform interrelationships by canonical ordination analysis

Abstract This paper examines the robustness of various multivariate ordination methods applied to elucidate the relationship between soil developed on hillslope and the environment in a South Australian subcatchment. Canonical correspondence analyses were found to be less attractive than the linear methods (i.e., principal component analysis and redundancy analysis) because interrelations among soil variables and/or between soil and the landform attributes are more linear than unimodal. Among the linear methods, standard redundancy analysis following transformation of soil data gave a clearer insight into pedogenetic implications of soil-landform interactions. Gradient angle, plan convexity, profile convexity and to a lesser extent, upslope distance and area, account for much of the soil variation in the study area. Gradient influences the distribution of surficial soil particles which is suggestive of selective removal and deposition of fine materials on the mid- to lower-slopes. Higher subsoil clay percentage associated with concave slopes may be ascribed to either increased weathering rate and/or flux of fine material due to convergence of water flows. Solum depth and depth to bedrock also appeared to have controlled some of the contemporary pedo-geomorphological processes. Eluvio-illuvial processes are more pronounced in the relatively deep lower-slope pedons evidenced by cutans in their subsoil layers. Soil colours are related to the soil depth attributes, slope and upslope distance and area, probably through the influence of these attributes on soil drainage condition. The extent to which landform and parent-material related attributes (e.g., depth to bedrock) affect soil development and distribution patterns in the study area is shown quantitatively. These findings have considerably improved our understanding of soil genesis in the study area and also point to the importance of land unit delineation to design sampling patterns. The enhanced sampling design would be beneficial in terms of reduced extrapolation error and thus misclassification of soil.

[1]  C. Braak Correspondence Analysis of Incidence and Abundance Data:Properties in Terms of a Unimodal Response Model , 1985 .

[2]  K. Mardia Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[3]  F. R. Troeh,et al.  Landform Parameters Correlated to Soil Drainage 1 , 1964 .

[4]  R. Merry,et al.  The measurement of carbon in soils using a microprocessor‐controlled resistance furnace , 1988 .

[5]  M. O. Hill,et al.  DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. , 1979 .

[6]  T. Speir,et al.  A principal components analysis of some biochemical activities in a climosequence of soils , 1975 .

[7]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  The role of topography in controlling throughflow generation , 1978 .

[8]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[9]  M. Walter The Adelaide Geosyncline: Late proterozoic stratigraphy, sedimentation, palaeontology and tectonics , 1991 .

[10]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Design of optimal sample spacings for mapping soil using fuzzy-k-means and regionalized variable theory , 1990 .

[11]  R. Huggett,et al.  Soil landscape systems: A model of soil Genesis , 1975 .

[12]  L. Lavkulich,et al.  Numerical Analysis of a Chronosequence, Including the Development of a Chronofunction1 , 1981 .

[13]  E. Batschelet Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[14]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Numerical taxonomy of soils from nine orders by cluster and centroid-component analyses. , 1970 .

[15]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[16]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Soil colour: its measurement and its designation in models of uniform colour space , 1985 .

[17]  I. Evans Statistical Characterization of Altitude Matrices by Computer. Report 6. An Integrated System of Terrain Analysis and Slope Mapping. , 1979 .

[18]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  Conceptual models in pedogenesis: Can soil-forming functions be solved? , 1975 .

[19]  A. R. Aandahl,et al.  The Characterization of Slope Positions and Their Influence on the Total Nitrogen Content of a Few Virgin Soils of Western Iowa , 1949 .

[20]  Tim Burt,et al.  Topographic controls of soil moisture distributions , 1985 .

[21]  Ward Chesworth,et al.  Book reviewPedogenesis and soil taxonomy: L. P. Wilding, N. E. Smeck and G. F. Hall. Vol. I concepts and interactions; vol. II. The soil orders, 1983, Elsevier, US $49.00 and $55.25 , 1985 .

[22]  G. F. Hall Chapter 5 - Pedology and Geomorphology , 1983 .

[23]  J. Bouma,et al.  Use of soil-map delineations to improve (Co-)kriging of point data on moisture deficits , 1988 .

[24]  E. O'Loughlin,et al.  Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties , 1981 .

[25]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  MULTIPLE DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS IN SOIL SURVEY , 1974 .

[26]  R. Webster,et al.  Improving a reconnaissance soil classification by multivariate methods , 1976 .

[27]  E. O. Mclean Soil pH and Lime Requirement , 1982 .

[28]  C. Thorne,et al.  Quantitative analysis of land surface topography , 1987 .

[29]  E. Cotsaris,et al.  Seasonal changes in pathways of dissolved organic carbon through a hillslope soil (Xeralf) with contrasting texture , 1992 .

[30]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[31]  Richard Webster,et al.  CANONICAL CORRELATION IN PEDOLOGY: HOW USEFUL? , 1977 .

[32]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Spatial dependence and classification of the soil along a transect in northeast Scotland , 1981 .