Combining brief contact interventions (BCI) into a decision-making algorithm to reduce suicide reattempt: the VigilanS study protocol

Introduction The early postattempt period is considered to be one of the most at-risk time windows for suicide reattempt or completion. Among the postcrisis prevention programmes developed to compensate for this risk, brief contact interventions (BCIs) have been proven to be efficient but not equally for each subpopulation of attempters. VigilanS is a region-wide programme that relies on an algorithmic system to tailor surveillance and BCI provisions to individuals discharged from the hospital after a suicide attempt. Aim VigilanS’ main objective is to reduce suicide and suicide reattempt rates both at the individual level (patients included in VigilanS) and at the populational level (inhabitants of the Nord–Pas-de-Calais region). Methods and analysis At discharge, every attempter coming from a participating centre is given a crisis card with an emergency number to contact in case of distress. Patients are then systematically recontacted 6 months later. An additional 10-day call is also given if the index suicide attempt is not the first one. Depending on the clinical evaluation during the phone call, the call team may carry out proportionated crisis interventions. Personalised postcards are sent whenever patients are unreachable by phone or in distress. On the populational level, mean suicide and suicide attempt rates in Nord–Pas-de-Calais will be compared before and after the implementation of the programme. Here/there cross-sectional comparisons with a control region will test the spatial specificity of the observed fluctuations, while time-series analyses will be performed to corroborate the temporal plausibility of imputing these fluctuations to the implementation of the programme. On the individual level, patients entered in VigilanS will be prospectively compared with a matched control cohort by means of survival analyses (survival curve comparisons and Cox models). Discussion VigilanS interventional components fall under the ordinary law care regime, and the individuals’ general rights as patients apply with no addendums or restrictions for their participation in the programme. The research section received authorisation from the Ethical Committee of Lille Nord-Ouest under the caption ‘Study aimed at evaluating routine care’ and is registered in ‘Clinical Trials’. The French Ministry of Health plans to extend the experimentation to other regions and probe the relevance of this type of ‘bottom–up’ territorial prevention policy at the national level. Trial registration number NCT03134885.

[1]  P. Courtet,et al.  Surveillance Is a Powerful Tool to Prevent Suicidal Acts , 2016 .

[2]  Barbara Stanley,et al.  The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. , 2011, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Suicide after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care , 1993, The Lancet.

[4]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[5]  S. Berrouiguet,et al.  Post-acute crisis text messaging outreach for suicide prevention: A pilot study , 2014, Psychiatry Research.

[6]  E du Roscoät,et al.  Efficient interventions on suicide prevention: a literature review. , 2013, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[7]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Crisis card following self-harm: 12-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. , 2005, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[8]  K. Clover,et al.  Postcards from the EDge project: randomised controlled trial of an intervention using postcards to reduce repetition of hospital treated deliberate self poisoning , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  J A Motto,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of postcrisis suicide prevention. , 2001, Psychiatric services.

[10]  J. Pirkis,et al.  Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: Systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide , 2015, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  Vladimir Carli,et al.  Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. , 2016, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[12]  N. Yonemoto,et al.  Interventions to prevent repeat suicidal behavior in patients admitted to an emergency department for a suicide attempt: a meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of affective disorders.

[13]  G. Vaiva,et al.  Effect of telephone contact on further suicide attempts in patients discharged from an emergency department: randomised controlled study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  S. Pirkola,et al.  The characteristics of suicides within a week of discharge after psychiatric hospitalisation – a nationwide register study , 2005, BMC psychiatry.