Validation of Direct Registration of Whole-Mount Prostate Digital Histopathology to ex vivo MR Images

Accurate determination of cancer stage and grade from in vivo prostate imaging could improve biopsy guidance, therapy selection and, possibly, focal therapy guidance. Validating prostate cancer imaging ideally requires accurate 3D registration of in vivo imaging to histopathology, which is facilitated by intermediate histology-ex vivo imaging registration. This work introduces and evaluates a direct registration with fiducialbased local refinement of digital prostate histopathology to ex vivo magnetic resonance (MR) images that obviates three elements typical of existing methods: (1) guidance of specimen slicing, (2) imaging/photography of sliced tissue blocks, and (3) registration guidance based on anatomical image features. The mean target registration error (TRE) of 98 intrinsic landmarks across 21 histology images was calculated for the proposed direct registration (0.7 mm) and compared to existing approaches: indirect using tissue block MR images (0.8 mm) and image-guided-slicing-based (1.0 mm). The local refinement was also shown to improve existing approaches to achieve a similar mean TRE (0.7 mm).

[1]  Choon Hua Thng,et al.  Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[2]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate cancer imaging , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[3]  P. Choyke,et al.  A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[4]  Hyunjin Park,et al.  Registration methodology for histological sections and in vivo imaging of human prostate. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[5]  Miguel Srougi,et al.  Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  D. Shen,et al.  Registering histological and MR images of prostate for image-based cancer detection. , 2007, Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[10]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Tissue block MRI for slice orientation-independent registration of digital histology images to ex vivo MRI of the prostate , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[13]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Mutual Information for Automated Unwarping of Rat Brain Autoradiographs , 1997, NeuroImage.

[15]  Katsuyuki Nakanishi,et al.  Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: Can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Registration of In Vivo Prostate Magnetic Resonance Images to Digital Histopathology Images , 2010, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[17]  C Cummings,et al.  Processing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation of data from histopathological, molecular biological, and radiological studies: a new whole organ technique , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[18]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Improved correlation of histological data with DCE MRI parameter maps by 3D reconstruction, reslicing and parameterization of the histological images , 2005, European Radiology.

[19]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Non-rigid registration between histological and MR images of the prostate: A joint segmentation and registration framework , 2009, CVPR 2009.

[20]  Junqian Xu,et al.  Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Dwight G. Nishimura,et al.  CORRELATION OF HISTOLOGIC SECTIONS AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN EX-VIVO HUMAN PROSTATE SPECIMENS , 2009 .