Bayesian Framework with Non-local and Low-rank Constraint for Image Reconstruction

Built upon the similar methodology of 'grouping and collaboratively filtering', the proposed algorithm recovers image patches from the array of similar noisy patches based on the assumption that their noise-free versions or approximation lie in a low dimensional subspace and has a low rank. Based on the analysis of the effect of noise and perturbation on the singular value, a weighted nuclear norm is defined to replace the conventional nuclear norm. Corresponding low-rank decomposition model and singular value shrinkage operator are derived. Taking into account the difference between the distribution of the signal and the noise, the weight depends not only on the standard deviation of noise, but also on the rank of the noise-free matrix and the singular value itself. Experimental results in image reconstruction tasks show that at relatively low computational cost the performance of proposed method is very close to state-of-the-art reconstruction methods BM3D and LSSC even outperforms them in restoring and preserving structure

[1]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Non-local sparse models for image restoration , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  Thomas W. Parks,et al.  Adaptive principal components and image denoising , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[3]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[5]  David Zhang,et al.  Two-stage image denoising by principal component analysis with local pixel grouping , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  John Wright,et al.  RASL: Robust alignment by sparse and low-rank decomposition for linearly correlated images , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Clustering-Based Denoising With Locally Learned Dictionaries , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Exact Matrix Completion via Convex Optimization , 2009, Found. Comput. Math..

[9]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[10]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[11]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Matrix Completion With Noise , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Patch-Based Near-Optimal Image Denoising , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[15]  Jian-Feng Cai,et al.  Split Bregman Methods and Frame Based Image Restoration , 2009, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[16]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sparsity-based image denoising via dictionary learning and structural clustering , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[17]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  Konstantinos Konstantinides,et al.  Statistical analysis of effective singular values in matrix rank determination , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..