Measuring and monitoring collective attention during shocking events

There has been growing interest in leveraging Web-based social and communication technologies for better crisis response. How might the Web platforms be used as an observatory to systematically understand the dynamics of the public’s attention during disaster events? And how could we monitor such attention in a cost-effective way? In this work, we propose an ‘attention shift network’ framework to systematically observe, measure, and analyze the dynamics of collective attention in response to real-world exogenous shocks such as disasters. Through tracing hashtags that appeared in Twitter users’ complete timeline around several violent terrorist attacks, we study the properties of network structures and reveal the temporal dynamics of the collective attention across multiple disasters. Further, to enable an efficient monitoring of the collective attention dynamics, we propose an effective stochastic sampling approach that accounts for the users’ hashtag adoption frequency, connectedness and diversity, as well as data variability. We conduct extensive experiments to show that the proposed sampling approach significantly outperforms several alternative methods in both retaining the network structures and preserving the information with a small set of sampling targets, suggesting the utility of the proposed method in various realistic settings.

[1]  F. Vis TWITTER AS A REPORTING TOOL FOR BREAKING NEWS , 2013 .

[2]  David Lazer,et al.  #Bigbirds Never Die: Understanding Social Dynamics of Emergent Hashtags , 2013, ICWSM.

[3]  Sara B. Soderstrom,et al.  Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms , 2010 .

[4]  Jacob G Foster,et al.  Edge direction and the structure of networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[6]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations , 2009, CHI.

[7]  David Lazer,et al.  Rising Tides or Rising Stars?: Dynamics of Shared Attention on Twitter during Media Events , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  J. Delvenne,et al.  Random walks on graphs , 2004 .

[9]  Zhiyuan Cheng,et al.  Detecting collective attention spam , 2012, WebQuality '12.

[10]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of temporal variation in online media , 2011, WSDM '11.

[11]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  User oriented tweet ranking: a filtering approach to microblogs , 2011, CIKM '11.

[12]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[13]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Methods for Sampling Pages Uniformly from the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[14]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Collective Decision Dynamics in the Presence of External Drivers , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Philip Treleaven,et al.  Quantifying the Digital Traces of Hurricane Sandy on Flickr , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Erik M. Volz,et al.  Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling , 2008 .

[17]  Y. Lin,et al.  Tracking and Analyzing Individual Distress Following Terrorist Attacks Using Social Media Streams , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  Jie Yin,et al.  Using Social Media to Enhance Emergency Situation Awareness , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[19]  Lingfei Wu,et al.  The scaling of attention networks , 2016 .

[20]  Vincent A. Knight,et al.  Tweeting the terror: modelling the social media reaction to the Woolwich terrorist attack , 2014, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[21]  John R. Talburt,et al.  From Chirps to Whistles: Discovering Event-specific Informative Content from Twitter , 2015, WebSci.

[22]  Wenjun Zeng,et al.  The Attention Automaton: Sensing Collective User Interests in Social Network Communities , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[23]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  The dynamics of information-driven coordination phenomena: A transfer entropy analysis , 2015, Science Advances.

[24]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Sampling from large graphs , 2006, KDD '06.

[25]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Quantifying Collective Attention from Tweet Stream , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  Yu-Ru Lin,et al.  The ripple of fear, sympathy and solidarity during the Boston bombings , 2014, EPJ Data Science.

[27]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[28]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter , 2011, WWW.

[30]  Adam Acar,et al.  Twitter for crisis communication: lessons learned from Japan's tsunami disaster , 2011, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[31]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  K. Selçuk Candan,et al.  How Does the Data Sampling Strategy Impact the Discovery of Information Diffusion in Social Media? , 2010, ICWSM.

[33]  Mengdi Wang,et al.  The Signals and Noise: Actionable Information in Improvised Social Media Channels During a Disaster , 2017, WebSci.

[34]  Wei Chen,et al.  Efficient influence maximization in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[35]  Hang Zhang,et al.  Finding diverse needles in a haystack of comments: social media exploration for news , 2016, WebSci.

[36]  F. Göbel,et al.  Random walks on graphs , 1974 .

[37]  Minas Gjoka,et al.  Walking in Facebook: A Case Study of Unbiased Sampling of OSNs , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[38]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Misako Takayasu,et al.  Empirical analysis of collective human behavior for extraordinary events in blogosphere , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  Metropolis Algorithms for Representative Subgraph Sampling , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.