Effectiveness of an Audience Response System in Teaching Pharmacology to Baccalaureate Nursing Students

It has been proposed that students' use of an audience response system, commonly called clickers, may promote comprehension and retention of didactic material. Whether this method actually improves students' grades, however, is still not determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a lecture format utilizing multiple-choice PowerPoint slides and an audience response system was more effective than a lecture format using only multiple-choice PowerPoint slides in the comprehension and retention of pharmacological knowledge in baccalaureate nursing students. The study also assessed whether the additional use of clickers positively affected students' satisfaction with their learning. Results from 78 students who attended lecture classes with multiple-choice PowerPoint slides plus clickers were compared with those of 55 students who utilized multiple-choice PowerPoint slides only. Test scores between these two groups were not significantly different. A satisfaction questionnaire showed that 72.2% of the control students did not desire the opportunity to use clickers. Of the group utilizing the clickers, 92.3% recommend the use of this system in future courses. The use of multiple-choice PowerPoint slides and an audience response system did not seem to improve the students' comprehension or retention of pharmacological knowledge as compared with those who used solely multiple-choice PowerPoint slides.

[1]  R. Kraft.  Group-Inquiry Turns Passive Students Active. , 1985 .

[2]  T Eric Schackow,et al.  Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. , 2004, Family medicine.

[3]  Jeff Cain,et al.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[4]  G. DeBourgh,et al.  Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. , 2008, Nurse education in practice.

[5]  J. Brueckner,et al.  Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. , 2006, The Journal of nursing education.

[6]  L Halloran,et al.  A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture. , 1995, Computers in nursing.

[7]  Maryfran Barber,et al.  Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning , 1996, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[9]  Linda J Collins.  Livening Up the Classroom , 2007, Medical reference services quarterly.

[10]  Julie E. Legg,et al.  A progress assessment to evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[11]  B. Ashar,et al.  Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals , 2003, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[12]  Parvati Dev,et al.  Case Report: Audience Response Made Easy: Using Personal Digital Assistants as a Classroom Polling Tool , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  Use of a computerized audience response system in medical student teaching: Its effect on active learning and exam performance , 2006 .

[14]  Matti Uhari,et al.  Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures , 2003, BMC medical education.

[15]  Scott Freeman,et al.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  John S Blalock,et al.  Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system. , 2006, Journal of dental education.

[17]  R. Latessa,et al.  Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. , 2005, Family medicine.

[18]  L. Torbeck.  Enhancing programme evaluation using the Audience Response System , 2007, Medical education.

[19]  Kirsten Crossgrove,et al.  Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  Caroline Elliott,et al.  Using a personal response system in economics teaching , 2003 .

[21]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Explaining and Predicting Outcomes of Large Classrooms Using Audience Response Systems , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[22]  Anne Foegen,et al.  Group Response Technology in Lecture-Based Instruction: Exploring Student Engagement and Instructor Perceptions , 1999 .

[23]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Michèle Shuster,et al.  Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[25]  Jeffrey T Johnson,et al.  Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education. , 2005, Journal of dental education.

[26]  L. Burhansstipanov,et al.  The use of an electronic audience response system for data collection. , 2005, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[27]  Cande V Ananth,et al.  The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.