The use of detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in evaluating the performance of gamma camera systems

The imaging properties of an imaging system can be described by its detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Using the modulation transfer function calculated from measured line spread functions and the normalized noise power spectrum calculated from uniformity images, DQE was calculated with the number of photons emitted from a plane source as a measure for the incoming SNR2. Measurements were made with 99mTc, using three different pulse height windows at 2 cm and 12 cm depths in water with high resolution and all purpose collimators and with two different crystal thicknesses. The results indicated that at greater depths a 15% window is the best choice. The choice of collimator depends on the details in the organ being investigated. There is a break point at 0.5 cycles cm-1 and 1.2 cycles cm-1 at 12 cm and 2 cm depths, respectively. A difference was found in DQE between the two crystal thicknesses, with a slightly better result for the thick crystal for measurements at 12 cm depth. At 2 cm depth, the thinner crystal was slightly better for frequencies over 0.5 cm-1. The determination of DQE could be a method to optimize the parameters for different nuclear medicine investigations. The DQE could also be used in comparing different gamma camera systems with different collimators to obtain a figure of merit.

[1]  E. C. Gregg,et al.  Modulation transfer function, information capacity and performance criteria of scintiscans. , 1968, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  S.-Å. Stark,et al.  A Phantom for the Measurement of Transfer Functions in Nuclear Medicine Image Processing , 1993 .

[3]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[4]  S. R. Amtey,et al.  Practical considerations in gamma camera line spread function measurement. , 1978, Medical physics.

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Absolute measures of physical image quality: measurement and application to radiographic magnification. , 1982, Medical physics.

[6]  A. Todd-Pokropek Image Processing in Nuclear Medicine , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  Tom R. Miller,et al.  Design and application of finite impulse response digital filters , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  J. Moy,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter? , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  B. Persson,et al.  Imaging 123I with a scintillation camera. A study of detection performance and quality factor concepts. , 1977, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[10]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Image Science: Principles, Analysis and Evaluation of Photographic-Type Imaging Processes , 1974 .

[11]  James T. Dobbins Image Quality Metrics for Digital Systems , 2000 .

[12]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Noise analysis of scintillation camera images: stochastic and non-stochastic effects. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.