Scale as a lurking factor: incorporating scale-dependence in experimental ecology

Ecologists have recognized for decades the importance of spatial scale in ecological processes and patterns, as well as the complications scale poses for understanding ecological mechanisms. Here we highlight the opportunity attention to scale offers experimental ecology. Despite many advantages to considering scale, a review of the literature indicates that multiscale experimental studies are rare. Although much work has focused on scale as a primary factor (e.g. island size), we draw attention to scale as a ‘lurking’ variable: one which influences the relationship between two or more variables that are not usually understood to be scale-dependent. We highlight three basic observations from which scale-dependence arises: abundance increases with area, environmental conditions vary across space, and the effect of an organism on its environment is spatially limited. From these arise first-order scale-dependence, which relates an ecological variable of interest to a measure of scale. Combining first-order relationships together, we can produce second-order scale-dependencies, which occur when the relationship between two or more variables is mediated by scale. It is these relationships that are of particular interest, as they have the potential to confound experimental results. Most ecological experiments have incorporated scale either implicitly or not at all. We suggest that an explicit consideration of scale could help resolve some long-standing debates when scale is turned from a lurking variable into a working variable. Finally, we review and evaluate four different experimental sampling designs and corresponding statistical analyses that can be used to address the effects of scale in ecological experiments.

[1]  M. Biondini,et al.  Grazing intensity effects on litter decomposition and soil nitrogen mineralization , 1994 .

[2]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial scale and the detection of density dependence in spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern North America , 2000, Oecologia.

[3]  Elgene O. Box,et al.  Scale Effects in Landscape Studies , 1987 .

[4]  D. Padilla,et al.  Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns , 1987 .

[5]  C RuizdeVillaMdel,et al.  Repeated measures analysis , 2004 .

[6]  Joe N. Perry,et al.  Red–blue plots for detecting clusters in count data , 1999 .

[7]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance , 2011, Ecological Studies.

[8]  J. Connell Disturbance and recovery of coral assemblages , 1997, Coral Reefs.

[9]  Nelson G. Hairston,et al.  Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design and Execution , 1989 .

[10]  T J Stohlgren,et al.  The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. , 2007, Ecology.

[11]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: Lessons from coupled logistic equations , 1993 .

[12]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Predator-Prey Theory and Variability , 1978 .

[13]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[14]  W. Fagan,et al.  RARITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND THE SCALE DEPENDENCE OF EXTINCTION RISK IN DESERT FISHES , 2005 .

[15]  Kenneth Petren,et al.  Experimental Ecology: Issues and Perspectives , 1999 .

[16]  P. Reich,et al.  Opposite relationships between invasibility and native species richness at patch versus landscape scales , 2005 .

[17]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The scale transition: scaling up population dynamics with field data. , 2006, Ecology.

[18]  David C. Schneider,et al.  Spatial and temporal scaling in benthic ecology , 2008 .

[19]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity , 2001 .

[20]  R. O. Erickson The Clematis fremontii Var. Riehlii Population in the Ozarks , 1945 .

[21]  Robert Haining,et al.  Spatial data analysis , 2003 .

[22]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[23]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Assembly rules for New England ant assemblages , 2002 .

[24]  F. Micheli,et al.  Human impacts on the species-area relationship in reef fish assemblages. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[25]  Daniel A. Grijfith Statistical Techniques in Geographical Analysis , 1985 .

[26]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .

[27]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology , 2001 .

[29]  P. Chesson,et al.  Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions , 2002 .

[30]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data , 2002 .

[31]  J. Lawton,et al.  Why More Productive Sites Have More Species: An Experimental Test of Theory Using Tree‐Hole Communities , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Scale and food-web structure: from local to global , 1995 .

[33]  D. Schneider The Rise of the Concept of Scale in Ecology , 2001 .

[34]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[35]  Judi E Hewitt,et al.  The Effect of Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity on the Design and Analysis of Empirical Studies of Scale‐Dependent Systems , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[36]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[37]  F. Bormann,et al.  Natural disturbance and the steady state in high-altitude balsam fir forests. , 1981, Science.

[38]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. , 2000, Science.

[39]  David J. Mulla,et al.  Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence , 1992 .

[40]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments , 2003 .

[41]  J. Levine Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. , 2000, Science.

[42]  T. Allen,et al.  Toward a Unified Ecology. , 1994 .

[43]  K S McCann,et al.  The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[44]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson's paradox , 2000 .

[45]  A. Hastings,et al.  Density dependence : are we searching at the wrong spatial scale ? , 1996 .

[46]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: the effects of spatial scale , 1987 .

[47]  Bernard Fingleton,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis by Example, Vol. 2: Categorical and Directional Data. , 1990 .

[48]  C. Huffaker Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[49]  J. E. Byers,et al.  SCALE DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF BIOTIC RESISTANCE TO BIOLOGICAL INVASION , 2003 .

[50]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest , 1997 .

[51]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The influence of spatial resolution on macroecological patterns of range size variation: a case study using parrots (Aves: Psittaciformes) of the world , 2004 .

[52]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  M. Crawley,et al.  Determinants of Species Richness in the Park Grass Experiment , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[54]  B. Ripley The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes , 1976 .

[55]  M. Kaspari,et al.  Spatial Grain and the Causes of Regional Diversity Gradients in Ants , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[56]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Cluster Analysis of Spatial Patterns in Malaysian Tree Species , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology , 1998 .

[58]  V. Wolters,et al.  The Effects of Spatial Scale on Trophic Interactions , 2005, Ecosystems.

[59]  Johan van de Koppel,et al.  Scale-dependent interactions and community structure on cobble beaches. , 2005, Ecology letters.