Effectiveness of infrastructure asset management: challenges for public agencies

Purpose: The aim of this research is to better understand the decisions in infrastructure asset management at public agencies and the challenges of these agencies to improve the effectiveness of their decision making. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a literature review on asset management at public agencies, a case study was used to investigate the decision making of a provincial agency in The Netherlands. A total of 12 semi‐structured interviews with employees of the agency were conducted, amended by an analysis of policy documents, maintenance contracts, inspection reports, and planning documents. Findings: The research revealed that key challenges to achieving effective infrastructure asset management are: the establishment of alignment between infrastructure objectives, situation and intervention; the formulation of infrastructure objectives; and the management of multiple actors with different interests. Practical implications: Public agencies should pay more attention to clearly defined infrastructure objectives which are consistent with the agencies' strategic policy goals and interests of multiple stakeholders. That also includes that public agents need to develop new skills and knowledge to cope with the various challenges of effective infrastructure asset management. Originality/value: The research clustered decisions in infrastructure management into three decision areas and showed that effectiveness of the decision making is constituted through the interrelationship of these areas and depends on clearly defined objectives.

[1]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Developing a Road Map for Transportation Asset Management Research , 2004 .

[2]  R. J. Howard.  Infrastructure asset management under Australian Accounting Standard 27 (AAS27) , 2001 .

[3]  J.E. Amadi-Echendu.  Managing physical assets is a paradigm shift from maintenance , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[4]  M. Garvin,et al.  Characterization of Network Topology to Support Infrastructure Asset Management , 2009 .

[5]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Asset life cycle management : towards improving physical asset performance in the process industry , 2005 .

[6]  Dana J. Vanier,et al.  Why industry needs asset management tools , 2001 .

[7]  Jayantha P. Liyanage,et al.  Towards a value‐based view on operations and maintenance performance management , 2003 .

[8]  Jana Šelih,et al.  Multiple-Criteria Decision Support System in Highway Infrastructure Management , 2008 .

[9]  Gary L. Wamsley,et al.  The political economy of public organizations , 1973 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  S. Setunge,et al.  FRAMEWORK FOR INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING UNDER RISK AND UNCERTAINTY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT. IN: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS AND CASE STUDIES , 2003 .

[12]  F. Moon,et al.  Governing issues and alternate resolutions for a highway transportation agency's transition to asset management , 2009 .

[13]  D. Tsamboulas.  A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments , 2007 .

[14]  Michael J Markow,et al.  Performance-Based Planning and Asset Management , 2004 .

[15]  Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.  New Perspectives on Investment in Infrastructures , 2008 .

[16]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[17]  D. M. Karydas,et al.  A method for the efficient prioritization of infrastructure renewal projects , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Ralph I. Godau.  The changing face of infrastructure management , 1999 .

[19]  Yi-Chang Chiu,et al.  Decision Methodology for Allocating Funds across Transportation Infrastructure Assets , 2006 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[21]  Paul Rouse,et al.  Towards optimal life cycle management in a road maintenance setting using DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[23]  Hector Malano,et al.  Asset Management for Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure – Principles and Case Study , 1999 .

[24]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  Application of Shackle's Model and System Optimization for Highway Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty , 2009 .

[25]  D. L. Price.  NEW PERSPECTIVES ON , 1986 .

[26]  J. Koppenjan,et al.  Editorial: Managing Competing Public Values in Public Infrastructure Projects , 2008 .

[27]  Ivo Wenzler,et al.  Development of an asset management strategy for a network utility company: Lessons from a dynamic business simulation approach , 2005 .

[28]  Juan Gaytán Iniestra,et al.  Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..