Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake

Only a handful of the thousands of waste disposal wells across the United States have been linked to induced or triggered earthquakes. Still, two well-documented cases—Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Colorado, in the 1960s (Healy et al. 1968) and Paradox Valley, Colorado, in the 1990s (Ake et al. 2005)— demonstrate that fluid injection into the subsurface can trigger earthquakes. The largest event at Rocky Mountain Arsenal was M 5.2, and the largest event at Paradox Valley was M 4.3. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency provides Underground Injection Control (UIC) regulations administered by the states to protect underground sources of drinking water. However, the UIC does not limit the proximity of waste disposal wells to active seismic zones or to critical facilities ( e.g. , hospitals, schools, or nuclear power plants) based on the potential to induce or trigger earthquakes. Over the last several years, hydraulic fracturing (hydrofracking), a technique used to enhance natural gas recovery, has become widely used in north-central Arkansas (Figure 1). Wastewater, a byproduct of the hydrofracking process, is being injected under pressure into subsurface rocks at eight waste disposal wells (Table 1) in the study area. Since the first waste disposal well became operational in April 2009, the study area has experienced an increase in the rate of magnitude ≥ 2.5 earthquakes, with one in 2007, two in 2008, 10 in 2009, 54 in 2010, and 157 in 2011. The study area has a long history of seismic activity including earthquake swarms in the early 1980s (Chiu et al. 1984) and 2001 (Rabak et al. 2010), so the current earthquake-rate increase may simply reflect another peak in a natural cycle. However, 98% of the recent earthquakes occurred within 6 km of one of three waste disposal wells after the start of injection at those wells. This close spatial and …

[1]  Felix Waldhauser,et al.  hypoDD -- A Program to Compute Double-Difference Hypocenter Locations , 2001 .

[2]  Lisa V. Block,et al.  Deep-Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado , 2005 .

[3]  Robert H. Lafferty,et al.  The Earthquake Potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 2002 .

[4]  J. L. Imes,et al.  Geohydrology of the Ozark Plateaus aquifer system in parts of Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kansas , 1994 .

[5]  J. B. Fletcher,et al.  Analysis of analog and digital records of the 1982 Arkansas earthquake swarm , 1984 .

[6]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  J. G. Williams,et al.  A Reservoir Analysis of the Denver Earthquakes: A Case of Induced Seismicity (Paper 80B 1095) , 1981 .

[8]  J. Lahr HYPOELLIPSE; a computer program for determining local earthquake hypocentral parameters, magnitude, and first-motion pattern , 1979 .

[9]  Brian W. Stump,et al.  The Dallas-Fort Worth Earthquake Sequence: October 2008 through May 2009 , 2011 .

[10]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  Implications of hydrostatic pore pressures and high crustal strength for the deformation of intraplate lithosphere , 2001 .

[11]  E. Schweig,et al.  Subsurface structure of the eastern Arkoma Basin , 1990 .

[12]  J. Dewey,et al.  Plume-Generated Triple Junctions: Key Indicators in Applying Plate Tectonics to Old Rocks , 1973, The Journal of Geology.

[13]  William Walden Rubey,et al.  The Denver EarthquakeS. , 1968, Science.

[14]  P. Bodin,et al.  The Enola, Arkansas, Intraplate Swarm of 2001 , 2010 .

[15]  E. Schweig,et al.  Subsurface structure in the vicinity of an intraplate earthquake swarm, central Arkansas , 1991 .