A Numerical Investigation of Electrically-Heated Methane Steam Reforming Over Structured Catalysts

The use of electric energy as an alternative system to provide heat of reaction enables the cut-off of CO2 emissions of several chemical processes. Among these, electrification of steam methane reforming results in a cleaner production method of hydrogen. In this work, we perform for the first time a numerical investigation of a compact steam reforming unit that exploits the electrical heating of the catalyst support. First, for such unit we consider the optimal thermodynamic conditions to perform the power to hydrogen conversion; the process should be run at atmospheric pressure and in a close temperature range. Then, among possible materials currently used for manufacturing structured supports we identify silicon carbide as the best material to run electrified steam reforming at moderate voltages and currents. The temperature and concentration profiles in idealized units are studied to understand the impact of the catalyst geometry on the process performances and open-cell foams, despite lower surface to volume show the best potential. Finally, the impact of heat losses is analyzed by considering different operative conditions and reactor geometries, showing that it is possible to obtain relatively high thermal efficiencies with the proposed methodology.

[1]  G. Groppi,et al.  H2 production by methane steam reforming over Rh/Al2O3 catalyst packed in Cu foams: A strategy for the kinetic investigation in concentrated conditions , 2021 .

[2]  G. Luderer,et al.  The potential of direct steam cracker electrification and carbon capture & utilization via oxidative coupling of methane as decarbonization strategies for ethylene production , 2021 .

[3]  K. Lee,et al.  Advanced approach for catalytic decomposition of tar: Electrically heated catalyst system , 2021 .

[4]  Siglinda Perathoner,et al.  Redesign chemical processes to substitute the use of fossil fuels: A viewpoint of the implications on catalysis , 2021 .

[5]  A. Stankiewicz,et al.  Syngas production via microwave-assisted dry reforming of methane , 2021, Catalysis Today.

[6]  A. Stankiewicz,et al.  Microwave heating in heterogeneous catalysis: Modelling and design of rectangular traveling-wave microwave reactor , 2020, Chemical Engineering Science.

[7]  V. Palma,et al.  Electrically driven SiC-based structured catalysts for intensified reforming processes , 2020, Catalysis Today.

[8]  G. Groppi,et al.  Analysis of the effective thermal conductivity of isotropic and anisotropic Periodic Open Cellular Structures for the intensification of catalytic processes , 2020, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification.

[9]  D. Lee,et al.  Arc plasma reactor modification for enhancing performance of dry reforming of methane , 2020 .

[10]  F. Varsano,et al.  Supported catalysts for induction-heated steam reforming of methane , 2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[11]  G. Groppi,et al.  Investigation of packed conductive foams as a novel reactor configuration for methane steam reforming , 2020, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[12]  G. Groppi,et al.  FeCrAl as a Catalyst Support. , 2020, Chemical reviews.

[13]  L. Pellegrini,et al.  Design of the CO2 Removal Section for PSA Tail Gas Treatment in a Hydrogen Production Plant , 2020, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[14]  A. Dixon,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics for Fixed Bed Reactor Design. , 2020, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[15]  V. Palma,et al.  Microwaves and Heterogeneous Catalysis: A Review on Selected Catalytic Processes , 2020, Catalysts.

[16]  Liye Xiao,et al.  Enhancing CO2 methanation over a metal foam structured catalyst by electric internal heating. , 2019, Chemical communications.

[17]  G. Groppi,et al.  Investigation of pressure drop in 3D replicated open-cell foams: Coupling CFD with experimental data on additively manufactured foams , 2019, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[18]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  A techno economic analysis of the power to gas route , 2019 .

[19]  V. Palma,et al.  Study of the role of chemical support and structured carrier on the CO2 methanation reaction , 2019 .

[20]  I. Chorkendorff,et al.  Electrified Methane Reforming: Understanding the Dynamic Interplay , 2019, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[21]  Martin Thema,et al.  Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[22]  G. Groppi,et al.  A comparison between washcoated and packed copper foams for the intensification of methane steam reforming , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.

[23]  Ib Chorkendorff,et al.  Electrified methane reforming: A compact approach to greener industrial hydrogen production , 2019, Science.

[24]  G. Groppi,et al.  A fundamental investigation of gas/solid mass transfer in open-cell foams using a combined experimental and CFD approach , 2018, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[25]  J. Casas,et al.  3D-Printed Fe-doped silicon carbide monolithic catalysts for wet peroxide oxidation processes , 2018, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental.

[26]  L. Pino,et al.  Rh/CeO2 Thin Catalytic Layer Deposition on Alumina Foams: Catalytic Performance and Controlling Regimes in Biogas Reforming Processes , 2018, Catalysts.

[27]  A. Bakhtyari,et al.  Hydrogen Production Through Pyrolysis , 2018, Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production.

[28]  Stefano Campanari,et al.  Modelling the integrated power and transport energy system: The role of power-to-gas and hydrogen in long-term scenarios for Italy , 2018, Energy.

[29]  A. Onorati,et al.  CFD Investigation of the Impact of Electrical Heating on the Light-off of a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst , 2018 .

[30]  G. Groppi,et al.  Development of a heat transport model for open-cell metal foams with high cell densities , 2017 .

[31]  G. Groppi,et al.  Analytical Geometrical Model of Open Cell Foams with Detailed Description of Strut-Node Intersection , 2017 .

[32]  L. Mleczko,et al.  Experimental study of methane dry reforming in an electrically heated reactor , 2015 .

[33]  D. Rooney,et al.  Biogas reforming using renewable wind energy and induction heating , 2015 .

[34]  G. Groppi,et al.  Accurate prediction of the effective radial conductivity of highly conductive honeycomb monoliths with square channels , 2013 .

[35]  G. Groppi,et al.  Catalytic partial oxidation of methane over a 4% Rh/α-Al2O3 catalyst: Part I: Kinetic study in annular reactor , 2008 .

[36]  Douglas C. Giancoli.  Physics: Principles with Applications , 1999 .

[37]  Pio Forzatti,et al.  Adequacy of lumped parameter models for SCR reactors with monolith structure , 1992 .

[38]  Robert Lemlich,et al.  A theory for the limiting conductivity of polyhedral foam at low density , 1978 .

[39]  Chang Won Yoon,et al.  A compact catalytic foam reactor for decomposition of ammonia by the Joule-heating mechanism , 2021 .

[40]  L. Glicksman.  Heat transfer in foams , 1994 .