Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine

In the past, several techniques have been developed to study and analyse the 3D characteristics of the human spine: multi-view radiographic or biplanar 3D reconstructions, CT-scan 3D reconstructions and geometric models. Extensive evaluations of three of these techniques that are routinely used at Sainte-Justine Hospital (Montréal, Canada) are presented. The accuracy of these methods is assessed by comparing them with precise measurements made with a coordinate measuring machine on 17 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae (T1-L5) extracted from a normal cadaveric spine specimen. Multi-view radiographic 3D reconstructions are evaluated for different combinations of X-ray views: lateral (LAT), postero-anterior with normal incidence (PAOo) and postero-anterior with 20o angled down incidence (PA20o). The following accuracies are found for these reconstructions obtained from different radiographic setups: 2.1±1.5 mm for the combination with PAOo-LAT views, and 5.6±4.5 mm for the PAOo-PA20o stereopair. Higher errors are found in the postero-anterior direction, especially for the PAOo-PA20o view combination. Pedicles are found to be the most precise landmarks. Accuracy for CT-scan 3D reconstructions is about 1.1±0.8 mm. As for a geometric model built using a multiview radiographic reconstruction based on six landmarks per vertebra, accuracies of about 2.6±2.4 mm for landmarks and 2.3±2.0 mm for morphometric parameters are found. The geometric model and 3D reconstruction techniques give accurate information, at low X-ray dose. The accuracy assessment of the techniques used to study the 3D characteristics of the human spine is important, because it allows better and more efficient quantitative evaluations of spinal dysfunctions and their treatments, as well as biomechanical modelling of the spine.

[1]  H Labelle,et al.  Optimized vertical stereo base radiographic setup for the clinical three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Edmund Y. S. Chao,et al.  Verification of Roentgenographic Landmarks in the Lumbar Spine , 1977 .

[3]  J.A. de Guise,et al.  3D-biomedical modeling: merging image processing and computer aided design , 1988, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  I A Stokes,et al.  Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Effect of radiographic landmark identification errors on the accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  J. A. de Guise,et al.  Analyse infographique des déformations tridimensionnelles des vertèbres scoliotiques , 1997 .

[8]  M S Moreland,et al.  Three‐dimensional spinal curvature in idiopathic scoliosis , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  F Lavaste,et al.  Quantification of Three-Dimensional Vertebral Rotations in Scoliosis: What Are the True Values? , 1995, Spine.

[10]  S J Dwyer,et al.  A radiographic method for three-dimensional analysis of spinal configuration. , 1980, Radiology.

[11]  J Hindmarsh,et al.  Analysis of changes in the scoliotic spine using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  F Lavaste,et al.  [Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method]. , 1995, Annales de chirurgie.

[13]  G Selvik,et al.  Kinematic analysis of spinal fusions. , 1976, Investigative radiology.

[14]  H Labelle,et al.  Three‐dimensional Effect of the Boston Brace on the Thoracic Spine and Rib Cage , 1996, Spine.

[15]  I. Stokes Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. , 1994, Spine.

[16]  I. A. F. Stokes,et al.  Measurement of movement in painful intervertebral joints , 1980, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  F. Trochu A contouring program based on dual kriging interpolation , 1993, Engineering with Computers.

[18]  V. Kratky Analytical X-ray photogrammetry in scoliosis☆ , 1975 .

[19]  A Plamondon,et al.  Evaluation of Euler's angles with a least squares method for the study of lumbar spine motion. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[20]  Genaro Tolentino Marzan,et al.  Rational Design for Close-Range Photogrammetry , 1976 .

[21]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Simulation of scoliotic vertebral deformities: influence of control points on the prediction of the vertebrla morphology , 1995 .

[22]  C. L. Nash,et al.  Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.