The role of the Internet in cancer patients' engagement with complementary and alternative treatments

This article draws on a study of 80 National Health Service cancer patients and their experiences of using the Internet within disease and treatment processes. It focuses on the role the Internet plays in the context of potential or actual engagement with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The results depart from previous conceptualizations of the Internet as a major source of CAM knowledge, and second, as a major pathway to patient CAM usage. Moreover, the results highlight significant anxiety as patients attempt to process vast amounts of complex biomedical diagnostic and prognostic information online. For patients attempting to embrace alternative therapeutic models of cancer care, exposure to prognostic data may pose considerable risks to individual well-being and engagement with healing practices. On the basis of these results we problematize social theorizations of the Internet as contributing to such things as: the democratization of knowledge; the deprofessionalization of medicine; and patient empowerment. We emphasize, instead, the potential role of the Internet in reinforcing biomedicine's paradigmatic dominance in cancer care.

[1]  Joseph A. Diaz,et al.  Patients’ use of the internet for medical information , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  Sarah Nettleton,et al.  The Emergence of E-Scaped Medicine? , 2004 .

[3]  Eeva Sointu The search for wellbeing in alternative and complementary health practices. , 2006, Sociology of health & illness.

[4]  E Ernst,et al.  ‘Alternative’ cancer cures via the Internet? , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  K. Charmaz,et al.  'Discovering' chronic illness: using grounded theory. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[7]  M. Hardey Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise , 1999 .

[8]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[9]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[10]  Michael S. Goldstein,et al.  The Persistence and Resurgence of Medical Pluralism , 2004, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[11]  C. Seale New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[12]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[13]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  The Impact of CyberHealthcare on the Physician–Patient Relationship , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.

[14]  Roger Burrows,et al.  E-Scaped Medicine? Information, Reflexivity and Health , 2003 .

[15]  Alex Broom,et al.  Medical specialists’ accounts of the impact of the Internet on the doctor/patient relationship , 2005, Health.

[16]  C W Oliver,et al.  The quality of surgical information on the Internet. , 1999, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[17]  A. Broom The eMale , 2005 .

[18]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[19]  Complementary cancer care in Southampton: a survey of staff and patients. , 2002, Complementary therapies in medicine.

[20]  Roger Burrows,et al.  VIRTUAL COMMUNITY CARE? SOCIAL POLICY AND THE EMERGENCE OF COMPUTER MEDIATED SOCIAL SUPPORT , 2000 .

[21]  Richard Gallagher,et al.  A Population-Based Survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Men Recently Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer , 2003, Integrative cancer therapies.

[22]  M. Haug A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization. , 1988, The Milbank quarterly.

[23]  S. Salway,et al.  Gender, pregnancy and the uptake of antenatal care services in Pakistan. , 2007, Sociology of health & illness.

[24]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  A. Broom,et al.  Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Cancer Care: An International Analysis of Grassroots Integration , 2007 .

[26]  Richard Whittington,et al.  A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  H. Eastwood Why are Australian GPs using alternative medicine? , 2000 .

[28]  A. Jadad,et al.  Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. , 2002, JAMA.

[29]  B. F. Sharf Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. , 1997, Women & health.

[30]  N. Fox,et al.  The 'expert patient': empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[31]  J. Scholefield,et al.  Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. , 2003, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[32]  E. Ernst The prevalence of complementary/Alternative medicine in cancer , 1998, Cancer.

[33]  A. Broom,et al.  Therapeutic pluralism? Evidence, power and legitimacy in UK cancer services. , 2007, Sociology of health & illness.

[34]  Patricia Radin "To me, it's my life": medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[35]  N. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of complementary therapy use between breast cancer patients and patients with other primary tumor sites. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[36]  A. Broom,et al.  The Dialectical Tension Between Individuation and Depersonalization in Cancer Patients' Mediation of Complementary, Alternative and Biomedical Cancer Treatments , 2007 .

[37]  S. Timmermans,et al.  Evidence-based medicine and the reconfiguration of medical knowledge. , 2004, Journal of health and social behavior.

[38]  E. Willis,et al.  The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspective , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[39]  G. Eysenbach The Impact of the Internet on Cancer Outcomes , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[40]  D W Light,et al.  Managed competition, governmentality and institutional response in the United Kingdom. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[41]  S. Wyatt,et al.  'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[42]  E Ernst,et al.  Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[43]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDICAL SOCIOLOGY IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM , 2001 .

[44]  A. Vickers,et al.  Prevalence of complementary therapy use by women with breast cancer. A population-based survey. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[45]  Julia A Scott,et al.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[46]  L. Siu,et al.  Impact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  Robert Kiley,et al.  Does the internet harm health? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[48]  A. Broom Virtually He@lthy: The Impact of Internet Use on Disease Experience and the Doctor-Patient Relationship , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[49]  M. Stewart,et al.  Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: prevalence and perceptions. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.