Alternating Injection of Steam and CO2 For Thermal Recovery of Heavy Oil

A combination of rising oil demand and declining supply from the conventional sources is drawing global attention to the vast heavy-oil resources. These are commonly developed with steam-based processes which, in most cases, burn fossil fuel to generate the required steam. However, tightening constraints on fuel, water, and the environment are some of the factors currently fuelling the interests in enhancements to the traditional steaming operations. To mitigate some of the steam-related issues, we introduce two new thermal recovery methods, namely: (i) alternating-injection of steam and CO2 (SAC), and (ii) alternating-injection of steam and flue-gas (SAF). The primary objective of this research is to assess the technical and commercial feasibility of these new processes. To achieve this objective, we employ a combination of analytic modelling, numerical simulations and experimental studies, investigating the reservoir heat-transport aspects of steam-based processes, asphaltene-induced formation impairment, as well as the key controls on reservoir dynamics and project economics. In this work, the concepts of first-contact condensation (FCC) and multiple-contact condensation (MCC) have been introduced as additional mechanisms of heat-transport in steam-based processes. Hence, the traditional conductive-convective heat equations have been extended. Solutions of these equations indicate that laboratory and field observations are better rationalised, hence eliminating the current practice of employing unrealistic effective permeability and thermal diffusivity to explain these observations. We also provide conditions under which petroleum reservoirs may be analysed as adiabatic systems, and establish the relative influence of reservoir and operating parameters on reservoir heat-transport. Considering the asphaltene-precipitation potentials of CO2 and flue-gas, new models have been formulated for describing asphaltene-induced impairment of the permeability of porous media which, in turn, have been analysed as either closed (non-flowing) or open (flowing) systems. Application of the models to rationalise the experimental results from common porous media, which include sandstone, carbonate and glass-bead, validates their robustness. As a further test on the robustness of the proposed models, their main underlying assumptions have been validated with a set of capillary-flow experiments, which approximate asphaltene deposition at pore scale. As a case study for reservoir simulations, the Nigerian heavy-oil deposit has been examined. The sensitivity of reservoir response to reservoir, geometric (number and design of wells) and operating parameters has been quantified. From these results, a realistic set of dynamic-simulation models has been constructed for the Nigerian deposit. Within the parameter-space explored, the main subsurface uncertainties are reservoir geometry, permeability distribution as well as fluid and Lawal, A.K. (2011) Alternating Injection of Steam and CO2 for Thermal Recovery of Heavy Oil 5 relative-permeability models. In addition, all the processes, namely steam-alone, SAC and SAF, are vulnerable to geometric and operating parameters. On the net effect of in-situ asphaltene removal, the alternating-injection processes would only yield higher oil recovery than the steam-alone process if there is significant in-situ deasphalting such that the oil-viscosity reduction effect overrides the permeability impairment effect. Otherwise, the miscibility of these gases in the oil-phase is not sufficiently high to take advantage of the reduction of crude viscosity by dilution. Finally, within the range of parameters evaluated, the three processes are technically and commercially feasible for the Nigerian deposit investigated. However, in terms of economics and robustness against commercial risks, the order is SAC > steam-alone > SAF. The reservoir model, oil price and costs are found to be the main determinants of project risks. Given the limitations of this research and the uncertainties in the input data used for analyses, we complete the work by outlining the scope for further studies. Lawal, A.K. (2011) Alternating Injection of Steam and CO2 for Thermal Recovery of Heavy Oil 6