Tenets for the Proper Conduct and Use of Meta-Analyses: A Practical Guide for Neurosurgeons.

[1]  N. Syn,et al.  Association of metabolic–bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: a one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174 772 participants , 2021, The Lancet.

[2]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[3]  G. Lanzino,et al.  Radiological surveillance of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of 8428 aneurysms , 2020, Neurosurgical Review.

[4]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Transforaminal Endoscopic Solutions for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Complications , 2020 .

[5]  S. Shahrestani,et al.  Pure Endoscopic Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach to the Pineal Region: A Case Series , 2020 .

[6]  Saba Shahab,et al.  Challenges, Learning Curve, and Safety of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Sellar-Suprasellar Lesions in a Community Hospital , 2020, World Neurosurgery.

[7]  Tej D. Azad,et al.  Robot-Assisted versus Freehand Instrumentation in Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion: Experience with Real-Time, Image-Guided Spinal Robot. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[8]  H. Yasunaga,et al.  Propensity score matching analysis for the patients of unruptured cerebral aneurysm from a post hoc analysis of nationwide database in Japan: Propensity score matching analysis of UCA. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[9]  P. Herman,et al.  Hybrid robotics for endoscopic skull base surgery: preclinical evaluation and surgeons' first impression. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[10]  T. Santarius,et al.  Outcomes of subdural versus subperiosteal drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a multicenter cohort study. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[11]  Jack Bowden,et al.  A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses , 2018, Research synthesis methods.

[12]  I. Yang,et al.  Systemic Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Antimicrobial-Coated External Ventricular Drain Catheters for Preventing Ventriculostomy-Related Infections: A Meta-Analysis of 5242 Cases. , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[13]  S. Ourselin,et al.  Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis , 2018, Child's Nervous System.

[14]  Haichen Chu,et al.  The effect of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and transfusion on off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. , 2018, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[15]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  A re‐evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta‐analysis , 2018 .

[16]  Jian-hua Zhang,et al.  Traditional and cumulative meta-analysis: Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal carcinoma. , 2017, Molecular and clinical oncology.

[17]  P. Royston,et al.  Reconstructing Time-to-event Data from Published Kaplan–Meier Curves , 2017 .

[18]  P. Tugwell,et al.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[19]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Big-5 Quasi-Experimental designs. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  Hugh Waddington,et al.  Quasi-experimental study designs series – Paper 5: Classifying studies evaluating effects of health interventions – a taxonomy without labels , 2017 .

[21]  Dean Langan,et al.  Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta‐analysis: a review of simulation studies , 2016, Research synthesis methods.

[22]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[23]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[24]  T. Nakayama,et al.  Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis , 2016, BMC Gastroenterology.

[25]  A. Jena,et al.  Regression discontinuity designs in healthcare research , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[26]  Neil Pearce,et al.  Analysis of matched case-control studies , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[27]  W. Lau,et al.  Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  F. Barker.  Editorial: Randomized clinical trials and neurosurgery. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  E. Stuart,et al.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12 894 meta‐analyses , 2015, Research synthesis methods.

[31]  Till Bärnighausen,et al.  Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  Till Bärnighausen,et al.  Regression Discontinuity Designs in Epidemiology , 2014, Epidemiology.

[33]  Jiming Liu,et al.  Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[34]  F. Boop,et al.  Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[35]  Paul Klimo,et al.  An analysis of publication productivity for 1225 academic neurosurgeons and 99 departments in the United States. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[36]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates From Prospective Nonrandomized Studies With Propensity Score Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Procedures , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[37]  P. Austin.  The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[38]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Michael Borenstein,et al.  Meta-Analysis and Subgroups , 2013, Prevention Science.

[40]  P. Tugwell,et al.  An introduction to methodological issues when including non‐randomised studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions , 2013, Research synthesis methods.

[41]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Levels of evidence in the neurosurgical literature: more tribulations than trials. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[43]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, European heart journal.

[44]  Phil Edwards,et al.  Effect of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding: systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  Simon G Thompson,et al.  Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[46]  Nicky J Welton,et al.  Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[47]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[48]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[49]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[50]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[51]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[52]  O. Kuss,et al.  Treatments effects from randomized trials and propensity score analyses were similar in similar populations in an example from cardiac surgery. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[53]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  How to obtain the confidence interval from a P value , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  A. Algra,et al.  Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[55]  Howard Balshem,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[56]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[57]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[58]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[59]  P. Austin.  Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[60]  Miguel A Hernán,et al.  The hazards of hazard ratios. , 2010, Epidemiology.

[61]  Peter Cummings,et al.  The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios. , 2009, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[62]  Ian R White,et al.  Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials , 2008, Clinical trials.

[63]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[64]  M. Sydes,et al.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis , 2007, Trials.

[65]  T. Nakayama,et al.  Comparison of Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials With Observational Studies in Digestive Surgery , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[66]  Andrea Cipriani,et al.  Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[67]  I. Hozo,et al.  Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[68]  Julia Koricheva,et al.  Cumulative meta–analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[70]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[71]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[72]  Harold I Feldman,et al.  Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[73]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 2001, JAMA.

[74]  S. Chinn.  A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[75]  I Olkin,et al.  Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[76]  A. Hartz,et al.  A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[77]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[78]  S. Sharp,et al.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[79]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[80]  J. Zhang,et al.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. , 1998, JAMA.

[81]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common , 1998, BMJ.

[82]  S G Thompson,et al.  Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[83]  S D Walter,et al.  The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[84]  F. Davidoff,et al.  Evidence based medicine , 1995, Lancet.

[85]  S Greenland,et al.  Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. , 1987, Epidemiologic reviews.

[86]  H. Morgenstern.  Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. , 1982, American journal of public health.