Advanced REACH Tool: development and application of the substance emission potential modifying factor.

The Advanced REACH Tool (ART) is an exposure assessment tool that combines mechanistically modelled inhalation exposure estimates with available exposure data using a Bayesian approach. The mechanistic model is based on nine independent principal modifying factors (MF). One of these MF is the substance emission potential, which addresses the intrinsic substance properties as determinants of the emission from a source. This paper describes the current knowledge and evidence on intrinsic characteristics of solids and liquids that determine the potential for their release into workplace air. The principal factor determining the release of aerosols from handling or processing powdered, granular, or pelletized materials is the dustiness of the material, as well as the weight fraction of the substance of interest in the powder and the moisture content. The partial vapour pressure is the main intrinsic factor determining the substance emission potential for emission of vapours. For generation of mist, the substance emission potential is determined by the viscosity of the liquid as well as the weight fraction of the substance of interest in the liquid. Within ART release of vapours is considered for substances with a partial vapour pressure at the process temperature of 10 Pa or more, while mist formation is considered for substances with a vapour pressure ≤ 10 Pa. Relative multipliers are assigned for most of the intrinsic factors, with the exception of the weight fraction and the vapour pressure, which is applied as a continuous variable in the estimation of the substance emission potential. Currently, estimation of substance emission potential is not available for fumes, fibres, and gases. The substance emission potential takes account of the latest thinking on emissions of dusts, mists, and vapours and in our view provides a good balance between theory and pragmatism. Expanding the knowledge base on substance emission potential will improve the predictive power of occupational exposure models and thereby the accuracy and precision of the exposure estimates.

[1]  M P VAN VEEN,et al.  Indoor air exposure to volatile compounds emitted by paints: experiment and model , 1999, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[2]  R. Rando,et al.  A Survey of Size-Fractionated Dust Levels in the U.S. Wood Processing Industry , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[3]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[4]  M Tischer,et al.  Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  Classification of occupational activities for assessment of inhalation exposure. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  P. Class,et al.  Dustiness of different high-temperature insulation wools and refractory ceramic fibres. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  Göran Lidén.  Dustiness testing of materials handled at workplaces. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Sylvia Bach,et al.  Determining the dustiness of powders--a comparison of three measuring devices. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  W. Fransman,et al.  Development and evaluation of an exposure control efficacy library (ECEL). , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[10]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Jin-woo Park,et al.  (Vapour + liquid) equilibria of (1-butanol + benzene, or toluene, or o-, or m-, or p-xylene) at T=308.15 K , 2004 .

[12]  J. Cherrie,et al.  An experimental simulation of an early rock wool/slag wool production process. , 1987, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[13]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Size selective dustiness and exposure; simulated workplace comparisons. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  Ian Lowndes,et al.  Assessment of the dustiness and the dust liberation mechanisms of limestone quarry operations , 2007 .

[15]  J. Wal,et al.  Dust control measures in Dutch brickworks. , 1990 .

[16]  A. Hocking,et al.  Dust exposures in the wood processing industry. , 1999, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[17]  K Y Chung,et al.  Dustiness testing and moving towards a biologically relevant dustiness index. , 1994, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Niels O. Breum,et al.  The rotating drum dustiness tester: Variability in dustiness in relation to sample mass, testing time, and surface adhesion , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  DOCUMENTATION OF A DUSTINESS DRUM TEST , 1996 .

[20]  R. Cuthbert,et al.  A study on dust emission, particle size distribution and formaldehyde concentration during machining of medium density fibreboard. , 2000, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[21]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[22]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced Reach Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[23]  Aage Fredenslund,et al.  Group‐contribution estimation of activity coefficients in nonideal liquid mixtures , 1975 .

[24]  William Popendorf,et al.  Industrial Hygiene Control of Airborne Chemical Hazards , 2006 .

[25]  D Leith,et al.  Experimental examination of factors that affect dust generation. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[26]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): overview of version 1.0 and research needs. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[27]  Andrew D Maynard,et al.  Investigation of the aerosols produced by a high-speed, hand-held grinder using various substrates. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[28]  Mary Ann Grelinger,et al.  An Apparatus and Methodology for Predicting the Dustiness of Materials , 1989 .

[29]  A. Thorpe,et al.  Factors Influencing the Production of Dust During the Hand Sanding of Wood , 1995 .

[30]  D M O'Brien,et al.  The application of dustiness tests to the prediction of worker dust exposure. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[31]  A. Fredenslund,et al.  PREDICTION OF ISOTHERMAL EVAPORATION RATES OF PURE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS—A THEORETICAL APPROACH BASED ON LAMINAR BOUNDARY LAYER THEORY , 1995 .

[32]  C Cowherd,et al.  Dust inhalation exposures from the handling of small volumes of powders. , 1989, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[33]  David Mark,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the dustiness of industrial minerals according to European standard EN 15051, 2006. , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.