Application of a fluorescent marker with quantitative bioburden methods to assess cleanliness

Abstract Background Improvement of environmental cleaning in hospitals has been shown to decrease in-hospital cross transmission of pathogens. Several objective methods, including aerobic colony counts (ACCs), the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay, and the fluorescent marker method have been developed to assess cleanliness. However, the standard interpretation of cleanliness using the fluorescent marker method remains uncertain. Objective To assess the fluorescent marker method as a tool for determining the effectiveness of hospital cleaning. Design A prospective survey study. Setting An academic medical center. Methods The same 10 high-touch surfaces were tested after each terminal cleaning using (1) the fluorescent marker method, (2) the ATP assay, and (3) the ACC method. Using the fluorescent marker method under study, surfaces were classified as totally clean, partially clean, or not clean. The ACC method was used as the standard for comparison. Results According to the fluorescent marker method, of the 830 high-touch surfaces, 321 surfaces (38.7%) were totally clean (TC group), 84 surfaces (10.1%) were partially clean (PC group), and 425 surfaces (51.2%) were not clean (NC group). The TC group had significantly lower ATP and ACC values (mean ± SD, 428.7 ± 1,180.0 relative light units [RLU] and 15.6 ± 77.3 colony forming units [CFU]/100 cm2) than the PC group (1,386.8 ± 2,434.0 RLU and 34.9 ± 87.2 CFU/100 cm2) and the NC group (1,132.9 ± 2,976.1 RLU and 46.8 ± 119.2 CFU/100 cm2). Conclusions The fluorescent marker method provided a simple, reliable, and real-time assessment of environmental cleaning in hospitals. Our results indicate that only a surface determined to be totally clean using the fluorescent marker method could be considered clean.

[1]  W. Rutala,et al.  Monitoring and improving the effectiveness of surface cleaning and disinfection. , 2016, American journal of infection control.

[2]  E. Gillespie,et al.  The role of ultraviolet marker assessments in demonstrating cleaning efficacy. , 2015, American Journal of Infection Control.

[3]  Yee-Chun Chen,et al.  Comparing visual inspection, aerobic colony counts, and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for evaluating surface cleanliness at a medical center. , 2015, American journal of infection control.

[4]  Philip Smith,et al.  Impact of Adenosine Triphosphate Detection and Feedback on Hospital Room Cleaning , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  Effectiveness of visual inspection compared with non-microbiologic methods to determine the thoroughness of post-discharge cleaning , 2013, Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.

[6]  D. Guerrero,et al.  Diagnostic assessment of different environmental cleaning monitoring methods. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[7]  P. Carling.  Methods for assessing the adequacy of practice and improving room disinfection. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[8]  C. Donskey,et al.  Beyond the Hawthorne Effect: Reduction of Clostridium difficile Environmental Contamination through Active Intervention to Improve Cleaning Practices , 2013, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  P. Carling,et al.  Improving Healthcare Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection Current and Evolving Issues , 2013, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[10]  D. Lubarsky,et al.  Decreasing Operating Room Environmental Pathogen Contamination through Improved Cleaning Practice , 2012, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  K. Ragan,et al.  Use of audit and feedback with fluorescent targeting to achieve rapid improvements in room cleaning in the intensive care unit and ward settings. , 2012, American Journal of Infection Control.

[12]  J. Boyce,et al.  Comparison of Fluorescent Marker Systems with 2 Quantitative Methods of Assessing Terminal Cleaning Practices , 2011, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[13]  R. Platt,et al.  Environmental cleaning intervention and risk of acquiring multidrug-resistant organisms from prior room occupants. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  D. Smyth,et al.  The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting. , 2010, American journal of infection control.

[15]  W. Rutala,et al.  Role of hospital surfaces in the transmission of emerging health care-associated pathogens: norovirus, Clostridium difficile, and Acinetobacter species. , 2010, American journal of infection control.

[16]  P. Carling,et al.  Improving environmental hygiene in 27 intensive care units to decrease multidrug-resistant bacterial transmission* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[17]  H Humphreys,et al.  Is it really clean? An evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness. , 2009, The Journal of hospital infection.

[18]  M. Rupp,et al.  Improving Cleaning of the Environment Surrounding Patients in 36 Acute Care Hospitals , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[19]  P. Carling,et al.  Identifying Opportunities to Enhance Environmental Cleaning in 23 Acute Care Hospitals , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[20]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.