Epigenetic Enzymes, Age, and Ancestry Regulate the Efficiency of Human iPSC Reprogramming

Epigenetic enzymes regulate higher‐order chromatin architecture and cell‐type specific gene expression. The ATPase BRG1 and the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex are epigenetic enzymes that regulate chromatin accessibility during steady and transitional cell states. Experiments in mice show that the loss of BRG1 inhibits cellular reprogramming, while studies using human cells demonstrate that the overexpression of BRG1 enhances reprogramming. We hypothesized that the variation of SWI/SNF subunit expression in the human population would contribute to variability in the efficiency of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) reprogramming. To examine the impact of an individual's sex, ancestry, and age on iPSC reprogramming, we created a novel sex and ancestry balanced cohort of 240 iPSC lines derived from human dermal fibroblasts (DF) from 80 heathy donors. We methodically assessed the reprogramming efficiency of each DF line and then quantified the individual and demographic‐specific variations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling proteins and mRNA expression. We identified BRG1, BAF155, and BAF60a expression as strongly correlating with iPSC reprogramming efficiency. Additionally, we discovered that high efficiency iPSC reprograming is negatively correlated with donor age, positively correlated with African American descent, and uncorrelated with donor sex. These results show the variations in chromatin remodeling protein expression have a strong impact on iPSC reprogramming. Additionally, our cohort is unique in its large size, diversity, and focus on healthy donors. Consequently, this cohort can be a vital tool for researchers seeking to validate observational results from human population studies and perform detailed mechanistic studies in a controlled cell culture environment. Stem Cells 2018;36:1697–1708

[1]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2017, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[2]  M. Ptashne,et al.  OCT4 and SOX2 Work as Transcriptional Activators in Reprogramming Human Fibroblasts. , 2017, Cell reports.

[3]  C. Leslie,et al.  The SWI/SNF Protein PBRM1 Restrains VHL-Loss-Driven Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. , 2017, Cell reports.

[4]  K. Kang,et al.  Reprogramming Enhancers in Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, iPSC Technology, and Direct Conversion , 2017, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[5]  E. Lavezzo,et al.  Reprogramming Methods Do Not Affect Gene Expression Profile of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[6]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  J. Staiger,et al.  mSWI/SNF (BAF) Complexes Are Indispensable for the Neurogenesis and Development of Embryonic Olfactory Epithelium , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[8]  Ashok Patel,et al.  Chromatin remodelers: We are the drivers!! , 2016, Nucleus.

[9]  A. Trounson,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells progressing to the clinic , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  A decade of transcription factor-mediated reprogramming to pluripotency , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  James M. Ward,et al.  MiRNA‐Mediated Regulation of the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complex Controls Pluripotency and Endodermal Differentiation in Human ESCs , 2015, Stem cells.

[13]  J. Downs,et al.  The SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex: Its role in maintaining genome stability and preventing tumourigenesis. , 2015, DNA repair.

[14]  T. Raivio,et al.  Combined negative effect of donor age and time in culture on the reprogramming efficiency into induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2015, Stem cell research.

[15]  T. Archer,et al.  Glucocorticoid Receptor Transcriptional Activation via the BRG1-Dependent Recruitment of TOP2β and Ku70/86 , 2015, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  TangYong,et al.  Knockdown of Brm and Baf170, Components of Chromatin Remodeling Complex, Facilitates Reprogramming of Somatic Cells. , 2015 .

[17]  R. Mailman,et al.  Transcriptional Repression by the BRG1-SWI/SNF Complex Affects the Pluripotency of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[18]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Dynamic regulation of human endogenous retroviruses mediates factor-induced reprogramming and differentiation potential , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Kenneth Cornetta,et al.  Design and Potential of Non-Integrating Lentiviral Vectors , 2014, Biomedicines.

[20]  P. Park,et al.  Rearranging the chromatin for pluripotency , 2013, Cell cycle.

[21]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogramming , 2013, Nature.

[22]  Tong Li,et al.  Is aging a barrier to reprogramming? Lessons from induced pluripotent stem cells , 2013, Biogerontology.

[23]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells in medicine and biology , 2013, Development.

[24]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[25]  A. Brunet,et al.  Aging and reprogramming: a two-way street. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  H. Okano,et al.  Establishment of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Centenarians for Neurodegenerative Disease Research , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Chromatin modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming , 2012, Nature.

[28]  A. Terzic,et al.  Reprogrammed keratinocytes from elderly type 2 diabetes patients suppress senescence genes to acquire induced pluripotency , 2012, Aging.

[29]  S. Takeda,et al.  Reprogramming efficiency and quality of induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) generated from muscle-derived fibroblasts of mdx mice at different ages , 2011, PLoS currents.

[30]  Sachiko Ito,et al.  Establishment of induced pluripotent stem cells from aged mice using bone marrow-derived myeloid cells. , 2011, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[31]  Ritchie Ho,et al.  Mechanistic insights into reprogramming to induced pluripotency , 2011, Journal of cellular physiology.

[32]  G. Crabtree,et al.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling: genetics, genomics and mechanisms , 2011, Cell Research.

[33]  Zachary D. Smith,et al.  Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[34]  R. Lafyatis,et al.  Generation of Transgene‐Free Lung Disease‐Specific Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using a Single Excisable Lentiviral Stem Cell Cassette , 2010, Stem cells.

[35]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[36]  Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Chromatin-Remodeling Components of the BAF Complex Facilitate Reprogramming , 2010, Cell.

[37]  M. Blasco,et al.  The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming , 2009, Nature.

[38]  A. Viale,et al.  Modeling Pathogenesis and Treatment of Familial Dysautonomia using Patient Specific iPSCs , 2009, Nature.

[39]  R. Stewart,et al.  Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Vector and Transgene Sequences , 2009, Science.

[40]  Keji Zhao,et al.  An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is an essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  R. Dı́az-Trelles,et al.  Coronary development is regulated by ATP-dependent SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling component BAF180. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[43]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[44]  R. Tjian,et al.  Polybromo protein BAF180 functions in mammalian cardiac chamber maturation. , 2004, Genes & development.

[45]  Christopher M. DeBoever,et al.  iPSCORE: A Resource of 222 iPSC Lines Enabling Functional Characterization of Genetic Variation across a Variety of Cell Types. , 2017, Stem cell reports.

[46]  Lanjuan Li,et al.  Current reprogramming systems in regenerative medicine: from somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2016, Regenerative medicine.

[47]  Lanjuan Li,et al.  Improving the Reprogramming Efficiency of Somatic Cells to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. , 2015, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[48]  X. Tian,et al.  Knockdown of Brm and Baf170, Components of Chromatin Remodeling Complex, Facilitates Reprogramming of Somatic Cells. , 2015, Stem cells and development.

[49]  R. Chandra,et al.  Mechanism of Induction: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs). , 2015, Journal of stem cells.

[50]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[51]  B. Thiers Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2008 .

[52]  T. Archer,et al.  Review Nuclear Receptor Signaling | The Open Access Journal of the Nuclear Receptor Signaling Atlas The BRG1 transcriptional coregulator , 2022 .