Exploring Comparability in Disclosure of Non-IFRS Performance Measures

We investigate the comparability of non-IFRS performance measures and adjusting items (exclusions) disclosed by companies from eight countries adopting IFRS Standards (Australia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Singapore, Sweden and the United Kingdom) in their annual reports for the years 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2013 (1,577 company-years). Presently performance measures may be based on undefined IFRS subtotals (e.g., operating profit, EBIT, EBITDA) or may exclude items from IFRS defined totals (e.g., underlying net profit excludes IFRS line items) reflecting managers’ voluntary disclosure choices. We find some categories of adjustments are similar between countries (e.g., for impairment and merger and acquisition expenses) but the incidence and amount of adjustments vary widely between firms. The type of non-IFRS performance measures disclosed differ by country, likely reflecting prior national practices and positions of security market regulators. Based on our evidence, we conclude the IASB’s consideration of mandatory defined subtotals in the statement of financial performance would necessitate changes in financial statement presentation for companies but should improve comparability between them.

[1]  Ian Dennis,et al.  What is a Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting? , 2018, Accounting in Europe.

[2]  Theodore E. Christensen,et al.  Non‐GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Academia and Current Practice , 2018 .

[3]  PapaVincent.  The Widening Gap of Non-GAAP Financial Measures , 2017 .

[4]  S. Young,et al.  Transitory Earnings Components and the Two Faces of Non‐Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Earnings , 2015 .

[5]  G. Grudnitski,et al.  The role of reconciliation quality in limiting mispricing of non-GAAP earnings announcements by EURO STOXX firms , 2014 .

[6]  Helena Isidro,et al.  The Role of Institutional and Economic Factors in the Strategic Use of Non-GAAP Disclosures to Beat Earnings Benchmarks , 2014 .

[7]  Helena Isidro,et al.  The Effects of Compensation and Board Quality on Non-GAAP Disclosures in Europe , 2013 .

[8]  D. Christian,et al.  IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements , 2012 .

[9]  C. Nobes,et al.  IFRS Policy Changes and the Continuation of National Patterns of IFRS Practice , 2011 .

[10]  Ulf Brüggemann.  Intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption , 2011 .

[11]  Joerg-Markus Hitz.  Press Release Disclosure of ‘Pro Forma’ Earnings Metrics by Large German Corporations – Empirical Evidence and Regulatory Recommendations , 2010 .

[12]  Theodore E. Christensen.  Discussion of “Letting the ‘Tail Wag the Dog’: The Debate over GAAP versus Street Earnings Revisited”* , 2010 .

[13]  François Aubert.  The Relative Informativeness of GAAP and Pro Forma Earnings Announcements in France , 2009 .

[14]  Theodore E. Christensen,et al.  US Managers' Use of ‘Pro Forma’ Adjustments to Meet Strategic Earnings Targets , 2009 .

[15]  Holger Daske,et al.  Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences , 2008 .

[16]  B. L. Miller,et al.  Implications of Components of Income Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings for Future Profitability and Equity Valuation , 2007 .

[17]  A. Temnykh.  CESR-C: Performance of a Wiggler-Dominated Storage Ring , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference.

[18]  Ervin L. Black,et al.  Who Trades on Pro Forma Earnings Information , 2004 .

[19]  Russell J. Lundholm,et al.  The Predictive Value of Expenses Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings , 2003 .

[20]  David Burgstahler,et al.  Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect the Implications of Special Items for Future Earnings , 2002 .

[21]  L. Brown,et al.  Comparing the Value Relevance of Two Operating Income Measures , 2001 .

[22]  Richard G. Sloan,et al.  Gaap Versus the Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings , 2000 .