Evaluation and correction of optically derived leaf area index in different temperate forests

Abstract: In recent years optical techniques for rapid LAI measurements have been developed, but few studies have been performed to evaluate the accuracy of optical estimation of LAI in mixed deciduous-evergreen forest stands. In this paper, we assessed the accuracy of digital hemispherical photography (DHP) and the LAI-2000 for the estimation of effective LAI (Le) by comparison with litter collection LAI (LAIlit) in four mixed deciduous broadleaf and evergreen needleleaf forests and one deciduous needleleaf forest. We also evaluated the relative contribution of major error sources to the determination of LAI by optical methods, including the woody-to-total area ratio (α), the element clumping index (ΩE) and the needle-to-shoot area ratio (γE). Additionally, incorrect automatic photographic exposure has been considered for DHP. DHP Le underestimated LAIlit by an average of 44-70% in different forests, and the difference between LAIlit and DHP Le after correction for the automatic exposure, α, ΩE and γE ranged from 1% to 21% in five forest stands. In contrast, LAI values from LAI-2000 were more similar to the direct litter collection LAI. The LAI-2000 Le underestimated LAIlit by an average of 13-40% in these forests, while the accuracy of the best estimates of LAI using LAI-2000 methods is over 93% after considering α, ΩE and γE. The error caused by automatic exposure to DHP Le is larger than other factors in all forest stands, and the γE was the main uncertainty to LAI-2000 Le in most forest stands. Moreover, optical LAI (both DHP and LAI-2000) was significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with LAIlit, especially the corrected LAI obtained by the LAI-2000 (R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 1.04). Our results demonstrate that the above factors affect the estimation of LAI by optical methods, thus the species composition of a forest stand should be seriously considered in order to improve the accuracy of LAI by optical methods.

[1]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques , 2007 .

[2]  N. Walford,et al.  A simplified methodology for the correction of Leaf Area Index (LAI) measurements obtained by ceptometer with reference to Pinus Portuguese forests , 2014 .

[3]  Alain Royer,et al.  Measuring Leaf Area Index with the Li‐Cor LAI‐2000 in Pine Stands , 1994 .

[4]  Euan G. Mason,et al.  Comparison of direct and indirect leaf area index measurements of Pinus radiata D. Don , 2012 .

[5]  A. Gonsamo,et al.  The computation of foliage clumping index using hemispherical photography , 2009 .

[6]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Measurements of branch area and adjusting leaf area index indirect measurements , 1998 .

[7]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  Mapping Leaf Area Index in subtropical upland ecosystems using RapidEye imagery and the randomForest algorithm , 2014 .

[8]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests , 2005 .

[9]  P. Reich,et al.  Understorey diversity in southern boreal forests is regulated by productivity and its indirect impacts on resource availability and heterogeneity , 2012 .

[10]  R. Shaw,et al.  Leaf area measurements based on hemispheric photographs and leaf-litter collection in a deciduous forest during autumn leaf-fall , 1989 .

[11]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  On the correct estimation of effective leaf area index: does it reveal information on clumping effects? , 2010 .

[12]  G. Jin,et al.  Estimate of Leaf Area Index in an Old-Growth Mixed Broadleaved-Korean Pine Forest in Northeastern China , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  A. Cutini,et al.  Digital hemispherical photography for estimating forest canopy properties: current controversies and opportunities , 2012 .

[14]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[15]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography , 2007 .

[16]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  On the exposure of hemispherical photographs in forests , 2013 .

[17]  Jb Miller,et al.  A formula for average foliage density , 1967 .

[18]  Evaluating optical measurements of leaf area index against litter collection in a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in China , 2015, Trees.

[19]  J. Chen Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[20]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Estimating LAI in deciduous forest stands , 2005 .

[21]  Andrea Cutini,et al.  Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography , 2013 .

[22]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[24]  N. Breda Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[25]  Modeling leaf area index from litter collection and tree data in a deciduous broadleaf forest , 2011 .

[26]  J. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand , 1991 .

[27]  S. Ustin,et al.  Estimation of tree canopy leaf area index by gap fraction analysis , 1993 .

[28]  David Doley,et al.  Improving accuracy of canopy hemispherical photography by a constant threshold value derived from an unobscured overcast sky , 2014 .

[29]  Christopher H. Guiterman,et al.  Long-Term Thinning Effects on the Leaf Area of Pinus strobus L. as Estimated from Litterfall and Individual-Tree Allometric Models , 2012 .

[30]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Using direct and indirect measurements of leaf area index to characterize the shrub canopy in an ombrotrophic peatland , 2007 .

[31]  B Muys,et al.  Allometry and evaluation of in situ optical LAI determination in Scots pine: a case study in Belgium. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[32]  Patrick Schleppi,et al.  Estimating leaf area index in different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of methods , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[33]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  Comparison of direct and indirect methods for assessing leaf area index across a tropical rain forest landscape , 2013 .

[34]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[35]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Leaf area index measurements at Fluxnet-Canada forest sites , 2006 .

[36]  G. Jin,et al.  Optical and litter collection methods for measuring leaf area index in an old-growth temperate forest in northeastern China , 2013, Journal of Forest Research.

[37]  B. Muys,et al.  Influence of stand, site and meteorological variables on the maximum leaf area index of beech, oak and Scots pine , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[38]  E. Dufrene,et al.  Estimation of deciduous forest leaf area index using direct and indirect methods , 1995, Oecologia.

[39]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Leaf Area Index , 2014 .

[40]  Michael Sprintsin,et al.  Long term and seasonal courses of leaf area index in a semi-arid forest plantation , 2011 .

[41]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[42]  G. Russell,et al.  Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography , 1999 .

[43]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Continuous observation of leaf area index at Fluxnet-Canada sites , 2014 .