Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions

PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the potential clinical application of digitized silicone rubber impressions by comparing the accuracy of zirconia 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated from 2 types of data (working model and impression) obtained from a laser scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten working models and impressions were prepared with epoxy resin and vinyl polysiloxane, respectively. Based on the data obtained from the laser scanner (D-700; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), a total of 20 zirconia frameworks were prepared using a dental CAD/CAM system (DentalDesigner; 3shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark / Ener-mill, Dentaim, Seoul, Korea). The silicone replicas were sectioned into four pieces to evaluate the framework fit. The replicas were imaged using a digital microscope, and the fit of the reference points (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7) were measured using the program in the device. Measured discrepancies were divided into 5 categories of gaps (MG, CG, AWG, AOTG, OG). Data were analyzed with Student's t-test (α=0.05), repeated measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA (α=0.05). RESULTS The mean gap of the zirconia framework prepared from the working models presented a narrower discrepancy than the frameworks fabricated from the impression bodies. The mean of the total gap in premolars (P=.003) and molars (P=.002) exhibited a statistical difference between two groups. CONCLUSION The mean gap dimensions of each category showed statistically significant difference. Nonetheless, the digitized impression bodies obtained with a laser scanner were applicable to clinical settings, considering the clinically acceptable marginal fit (120 µm).

[1]  Andreas Bindl,et al.  Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro. , 2007, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[2]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[3]  Heike Rudolph,et al.  Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  A Kurbad The optical conditioning of Cerec preparations with scan spray. , 2000, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[5]  Wael Att,et al.  Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Heike Rudolph,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[7]  S Quaas,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. , 2005, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[8]  Jack I Nicholls,et al.  Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  S. Bayne,et al.  Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  Jason A Griggs,et al.  Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  José F L Lozano,et al.  Marginal fit of Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures. , 2008, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  Daniel Edelhoff,et al.  Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  Kohei Kimura,et al.  Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  W. Mörmann,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  Francisco Martínez-Rus,et al.  Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Gordon J Christensen,et al.  In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the future? , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[17]  Matts Andersson,et al.  Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  Alain Vanheusden,et al.  Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  Florian Beuer,et al.  Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[21]  Heidi B. Aaronson,et al.  Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. , 2008, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[22]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[23]  H Spiekermann,et al.  Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[24]  J. Pfeiffer Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). , 1999, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[25]  R DeLong,et al.  Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. , 2001, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[26]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.

[27]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[28]  Lothar Borchers,et al.  Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. , 2009, European journal of oral sciences.

[29]  Lothar Borchers,et al.  Stresses and distortions within zirconia-fixed dental prostheses due to the veneering process. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  In-Sung Yeo,et al.  In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[31]  A Ender,et al.  Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software. , 2003, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[32]  K. Boening,et al.  Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  Hsi-Yung Feng,et al.  Analysis of digitizing errors of a laser scanning system , 2001 .

[34]  C. Petrie,et al.  Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. , 2006, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[35]  Takashi Miyazaki,et al.  A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. , 2009, Dental materials journal.

[36]  M. Roos,et al.  Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.