Efficacy of infected tissue sample brief-culture on Lowenstein-Jensen media as pre-polymerase chain reaction (Pre-PCR) to diagnosis of Mycobacterium

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of Tuberculosis does not retain any bacteriological stain due to the high lipid content in its wall. Classic methods like acid-fast staining or Ziehl-Neelsen staining are used for the diagnosis. Nucleic acid amplification techniques such as PCR are very useful in the rapid diagnosis of infections by M. tuberculosis but the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction PCR is considerably lower because of the presence of inhibitory substances in tissues. The aim of this study was to improve the sensitivity of PCR in inhibiting tissue samples. Thirty-six lymph nodes isolated from Inoculated guinea pigs with BCG vaccine. After drinding and suspending samples in sterile distilled water; they were cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen. DNA extraction had been done after 5 days by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method. Finally, PCR had been done for each extracted DNA. Sensitivity of PCR before culture was 27.8% but 62.5% following brief-culture. The sensitivity elevated by short term culture on LJ and then PCR. It is due to diffusion of inhibitory substances into the substrate, as well as to increase the number of bacteria after the brief-culture.   Key words: Mycobacteria, tuberculosis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), brief-culture.

[1]  G. Pfyffer,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex, Mycobacterium leprae, and Other Slow‐Growing Mycobacteria , 2010 .

[2]  M. L. Mathur,et al.  Rapid culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on blood agar in resource limited setting. , 2009, Danish medical bulletin.

[3]  Sherry A. Dunbar,et al.  Identification and Differentiation of Clinically Relevant Mycobacterium Species Directly from Acid-Fast Bacillus-Positive Culture Broth , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  S. Sreevatsan,et al.  Influence of Type of Culture Medium on Characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Subtypes , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  J. Herrmann,et al.  Rapid Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis by PCR: Impact of Sample Preparation and DNA Extraction , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  S. X. Wang,et al.  Early identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in BACTEC cultures by ligase chain reaction. , 2002, Journal of medical microbiology.

[7]  T. Wichelhaus,et al.  Removal of PCR Inhibitors by Silica Membranes: Evaluating the Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosisKit , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  G. Woods,et al.  Enhanced mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of M. tuberculosis complex in positive ESP II broth cultures of nonrespiratory specimens. , 1999, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[9]  J. Heesemann,et al.  Comparison of MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB Systems for Recovery of Mycobacteria in a Routine Diagnostic Laboratory , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  G. French,et al.  Evaluation of three commercial detection systems for Mycobacterium tuberculosis where clinical diagnosis is difficult. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  U. Ozcelik,et al.  Comparison of three different primer pairs for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction in paraffin-embedded tissues. , 1998, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[12]  G. Marchetti,et al.  Evaluation of PCR in Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues: Comparison of Four Amplification Assays , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  S. Rüsch-Gerdes,et al.  Comparison of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with radiometric and solid culture for recovery of acid-fast bacilli , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  M. A. Francesco,et al.  Detection and identification ofMycobacterium avium in the blood of AIDS patients by the polymerase chain reaction , 1996, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[15]  J. Tercero,et al.  Simple and rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in bovine tissue samples by PCR , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[16]  G. Woods,et al.  Use of Gen-Probe AccuProbes to identify Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium gordonae directly from BACTEC TB broth cultures , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[17]  N. Warren,et al.  Use of Gen-Probe and Bactec for rapid isolation and identification of mycobacteria. Correlation of probe results with growth index. , 1990, American journal of clinical pathology.

[18]  S. Zanetti,et al.  Rapid detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Real Time PCR and Bactec 960 MIGT. , 2006, The new microbiologica.

[19]  D. M.TelentiPh.,et al.  The diagnostic usefulness of a DNA probe forMycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Gen-Probe®) in Bactec cultures versus other diagnostic methods , 2005, Infection.

[20]  G. Woods,et al.  AMPLICOR MTB polymerase chain reaction test for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in positive Difco ESP II broth cultures. , 1997, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[21]  M. Mendoza,et al.  The diagnostic usefulness of a DNA probe forMycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Gen-Probe®) in Bactec cultures versus other diagnostic methods , 1994, Infection.

[22]  H. Wiker,et al.  Diagnostic Pathology Immunohistochemical Diagnosis of Abdominal and Lymph Node Tuberculosis by Detecting Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex Specific Antigen Mpt64 , 2022 .