Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James C. Anderson,et al. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .
[2] Hangjung Zo,et al. Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation , 2015, Comput. Educ..
[3] Bing Wu,et al. Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[4] Chao-Min Chiu,et al. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[5] Taegoo Terry Kim,et al. Modelling roles of task-technology fit and self-efficacy in hotel employees' usage behaviours of hotel information systems. , 2010 .
[6] Susila Munisamy,et al. Does Reputation Matter? Case Study of Undergraduate Choice at a Premier University , 2014 .
[7] Tai-Kuei Yu,et al. Modelling the factors that affect individuals' utilisation of online learning systems: An empirical study combining the task technology fit model with the theory of planned behaviour , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[8] Albert Sangrà,et al. MOOC Design Principles. A Pedagogical Approach from the Learner"s Perspective , 2013 .
[9] K. Hew,et al. Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .
[10] Antonio-Ramón Bartolomé Pina,et al. Son los MOOC una alternativa de aprendizaje , 2015 .
[11] Paul Diver,et al. MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: opportunities and challenges , 2015 .
[12] Roland Helm,et al. The effects of a lack of social recognition on online communication behavior , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[13] José-Andrés Martínez-Silva,et al. Literatura y práctica: una revisión crítica acerca de los MOOC Literature and Practice: A Critical Review of MOOCs , 2015 .
[14] A. Bourke. A Model of the Determinants of International Trade in Higher Education , 2000 .
[15] Lin Xiao,et al. Promoting online learners' continuance intention: An integrated flow framework , 2016, Inf. Manag..
[16] Chin-Lung Hsu,et al. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..
[17] Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al. Delving into Participants’ Profiles and Use of Social Tools in MOOCs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[18] Princely Ifinedo,et al. Applying uses and gratifications theory and social influence processes to understand students' pervasive adoption of social networking sites: Perspectives from the Americas , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..
[19] C. Fornell,et al. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .
[20] Hsin Hsin Chang,et al. Task-technology fit and user acceptance of online auction , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[21] Blanca Hernández Ortega,et al. The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[22] Tor J. Larsen,et al. The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[23] Blanca L. Delgado-Márquez,et al. Being highly internationalised strengthens your reputation: an empirical investigation of top higher education institutions , 2013 .
[24] Zhenming Liu,et al. Learning about Social Learning in MOOCs: From Statistical Analysis to Generative Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[25] Diane M. Strong,et al. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..
[26] Yen-Hsun Chen,et al. An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: applying the technology acceptance model , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[27] Stuart J. Barnes,et al. Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: Empirical test of a research model , 2011, Inf. Manag..
[28] Rupert Ward,et al. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[29] Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al. Precise Effectiveness Strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in MOOCs , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[30] George Veletsianos,et al. Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[31] Anne Bartlett Bragg. MOOCs: Where to from here? , 2014 .
[32] Mingming Zhou,et al. Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach , 2014, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.
[33] Barbara D. Klein,et al. User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance , 2000, Inf. Manag..
[34] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[35] Ray-I Chang,et al. Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[36] Katy Jordan,et al. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .
[37] René F. Kizilcec,et al. Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..
[38] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[39] Sylvain Senecal,et al. Is more always better? Investigating the task-technology fit theory in an online user context , 2014, Inf. Manag..
[40] Euiho Suh,et al. Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..
[41] Ming-Chi Lee,et al. Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[42] Judith Ramsay,et al. Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[43] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.
[44] Karl Steffens,et al. Are MOOCs Promising Learning Environments , 2015 .
[45] Insung Jung,et al. A framework for assessing fitness for purpose in open educational resources , 2016, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.
[46] Martin Wetzels,et al. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..
[47] Anol Bhattacherjee,et al. Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..
[48] Hsi-Peng Lu,et al. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a social networking site: An extension of task-technology fit to social-technology fit , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[49] I. Ercan,et al. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Comparison of Model Fit Indices Used in Structural Equation Modeling under Multivariate Normality Comparison of Model Fit Indices Used in Structural Equation Modeling under Multivariate Normality , 2022 .
[50] Mingming Zhou,et al. Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective , 2016, Comput. Educ..