Discrimination Among Multiple Cutaneous and Proprioceptive Hand Percepts Evoked by Nerve Stimulation with Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays in Human Amputees

Objective: This paper aims to demonstrate functional discriminability among restored hand sensations with different locations, qualities, and intensities that are evoked by microelectrode stimulation of residual afferent fibers in human amputees. Methods: We implanted a Utah Slanted Electrode Array (USEA) in the median and ulnar residual arm nerves of three transradial amputees and delivered stimulation via different electrodes and at different frequencies to produce various locations, qualities, and intensities of sensation on the missing hand. Blind discrimination trials were performed to determine how well subjects could discriminate among these restored sensations. Results: Subjects discriminated among restored sensory percepts with varying cutaneous and proprioceptive locations, qualities, and intensities in blind trials, including discrimination among up to 10 different location-intensity combinations (15/30 successes, p < 0.0005). Variations in the site of stimulation within the nerve, via electrode selection, enabled discrimination among up to 5 locations and qualities (35/35 successes, p < 0.0001). Variations in the stimulation frequency enabled discrimination among 4 different intensities at the same location (13/20 successes, p < 0.005). One subject discriminated among simultaneous, alternating, and isolated stimulation of two different USEA electrodes, as may be desired during multi-sensor closed-loop prosthesis use (20/25 successes, p < 0.001). Conclusion: USEA stimulation enables encoding of a diversity of functionally discriminable sensations with different locations, qualities, and intensities. Significance: These percepts provide a potentially rich source of sensory feedback that may enhance performance and embodiment during multi-sensor, closed-loop prosthesis use.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Wendy Hill,et al.  Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[3]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[4]  B. Berglund,et al.  Adaptation and Recovery in Vibrotactile Perception , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  M Controzzi,et al.  Electro-cutaneous stimulation on the palm elicits referred sensations on intact but not on amputated digits , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Developing Non-Somatotopic Phantom Finger Sensation to Comparable Levels of Somatotopic Sensation through User Training With Electrotactile Stimulation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Stephen T. Foldes,et al.  Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  Linda Resnik,et al.  Home Use of a Neural-connected Sensory Prosthesis Provides the Functional and Psychosocial Experience of Having a Hand Again , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. F. Dammann,et al.  The Neural Coding of Stimulus Intensity: Linking the Population Response of Mechanoreceptive Afferents with Psychophysical Behavior , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  K W Horch,et al.  The neural signal for skin indentation depth. II. Steady indentations , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[12]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Elizaveta V Okorokova,et al.  Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand , 2019, Science Robotics.

[14]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  Information about Complex Fingertip Parameters in Individual Human Tactile Afferent Neurons , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Ravi V. Bellamkonda,et al.  Dexamethasone-coated neural probes elicit attenuated inflammatory response and neuronal loss compared to uncoated neural probes , 2007, Brain Research.

[16]  K. Horch,et al.  Effects of short-term training on sensory and motor function in severed nerves of long-term human amputees. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  S. Retterer,et al.  Dexamethasone treatment reduces astroglia responses to inserted neuroprosthetic devices in rat neocortex , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  J. Craig,et al.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[21]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[22]  Gregory A. Clark,et al.  Motor Control and Sensory Feedback Enhance Prosthesis Embodiment and Reduce Phantom Pain After Long-Term Hand Amputation , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  G.S. Dhillon,et al.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  T. Yoshioka,et al.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Cynthia A Chestek,et al.  Factors associated with interest in novel interfaces for upper limb prosthesis control , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  Sliman J. Bensmaia,et al.  Intensity Discriminability of Electrocutaneous and Intraneural Stimulation Pulse Frequency in Intact Individuals and Amputees , 2020, 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC).

[27]  K. Horch,et al.  Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[28]  Antony W Goodwin,et al.  Human Ability to Scale and Discriminate Forces Typical of Those Occurring during Grasp and Manipulation , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Alicia J. Davis,et al.  Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Hannes P. Saal,et al.  Touch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[33]  M. Paré,et al.  Distribution and terminal arborizations of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the glabrous finger pads of the monkey , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  K. Horch,et al.  The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  D. Hutchinson,et al.  A histological analysis of human median and ulnar nerves following implantation of Utah slanted electrode arrays. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[36]  J. Craig,et al.  Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration , 2007, Somatosensory & motor research.

[37]  David J. Warren,et al.  Using multiple high-count electrode arrays in human median and ulnar nerves to restore sensorimotor function after previous transradial amputation of the hand , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[39]  G A Clark,et al.  Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[40]  Robert M Friedman,et al.  Neural Coding of the Location and Direction of a Moving Object by a Spatially Distributed Population of Mechanoreceptors , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  R. Normann,et al.  A method for pneumatically inserting an array of penetrating electrodes into cortical tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  Sliman J. Bensmaia,et al.  Tactile intensity and population codes , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  Jeffrey M Yau,et al.  Neurophysiology of Tactile Perception : A Tribute to Steven Hsiao Feeling form : the neural basis of haptic shape perception , 2016 .

[45]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Rapid Neural Coding in the Retina with Relative Spike Latencies , 2008, Science.

[46]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[47]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grip force during restraint of an object held between finger and thumb: responses of cutaneous afferents from the digits , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile Sensory Control of Object Manipulation in Humans , 2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference.

[49]  Donald A. Wilson,et al.  Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[50]  Gregory A. Clark,et al.  Virtual Reality Provides an Effective Platform for Functional Evaluations of Closed-Loop Neuromyoelectric Control , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[51]  Gregory A. Clark,et al.  Intuitive neuromyoelectric control of a dexterous bionic arm using a modified Kalman filter , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[52]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[53]  R. Stein,et al.  Selective stimulation of cat sciatic nerve using an array of varying-length microelectrodes. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  David J. Warren,et al.  Restoration of motor control and proprioceptive and cutaneous sensation in humans with prior upper-limb amputation via multiple Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) implanted in residual peripheral arm nerves , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[55]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  M. Hollins,et al.  Perceived intensity of vibrotactile stimuli: the role of mechanoreceptive channels. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[57]  G. Ekman.  Weber's Law and Related Functions , 1959 .

[58]  Mark Hollins,et al.  The coding of roughness. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[59]  K. Horch,et al.  Object Discrimination With an Artificial Hand Using Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Tactile and Proprioceptive Pathways With Intrafascicular Electrodes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.