Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production.

The concept of hierarchical motor control has been viewed as a means of progressively decreasing the number of variables manipulated by each higher control level. We tested the hypothesis that turning an individual bimanual force-production task into a joint (two-participant) force-production task would lead to positive correlation between forces produced by the two hands of the individual participant (symmetric strategy) to enable negative correlation between forces produced by two participants (complementary strategy). The present study consisted of individual and joint tasks that involved both unimanual and bimanual conditions. In the joint task, 10 pairs of participants produced periodic isometric forces, such that the sum of forces that they produced matched a target force cycling between 5% and 10% of maximum voluntary contraction at 1 Hz. In the individual task, individuals attempted to match the same target force. In the joint bimanual condition, the two hands of each participant adopted a symmetric strategy of force, whereas the two participants adopted a complementary strategy of force, highlighting that the bimanual action behaved as a low level of a hierarchy, whereas the joint action behaved as an upper level. The complementary force production was greater interpersonally than intrapersonally. However, whereas the coherence was highest at 1 Hz in all conditions, the frequency synchrony was stronger intrapersonally than interpersonally. Moreover, whereas the bimanual action exhibited a smaller error and variability of force than the unimanual action, the joint action exhibited a less-variable interval and force than the individual action.

[1]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Ivry,et al.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Michael F. Loncharich,et al.  Visual information interacts with neuromuscular factors in the coordination of bimanual isometric force , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Junya Masumoto,et al.  Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Analysing Synchronization Phenomena from Bivariate Data by Means of the Hilbert Transform , 1998 .

[7]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Haptically Linked Dyads , 2006, Psychological science.

[10]  Ivana Konvalinka,et al.  Synchronised and complementary coordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[12]  Jurjen Bosga,et al.  Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. , 2007, Motor control.

[13]  Junya Masumoto,et al.  A leader–follower relationship in joint action on a discrete force production task , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  M. Latash Fundamentals of Motor Control , 2012 .

[15]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Nobuyuki Inui,et al.  Effects of Force Levels on Error Compensation in Periodic Bimanual Isometric Force Control , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Nobuyuki Inui,et al.  Control of increasing or decreasing force during periodic isometric movement of the finger. , 2010, Human movement science.

[18]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Disrupted Timing of Discontinuous But Not Continuous Movements by Cerebellar Lesions , 2003, Science.

[21]  K. Newell,et al.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Nobuyuki Inui,et al.  Effects of speech on both complementary and synchronous strategies in joint action , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[25]  Stacey L. Gorniak,et al.  Hierarchies of synergies: an example of two-hand, multi-finger tasks , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Junya Masumoto,et al.  Effects of movement duration on error compensation in periodic bimanual isometric force production , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  M. Latash,et al.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  MichaelRosenblum,et al.  Analysing Synchronization Phenomena from Bivariate Data by Means of the Hilbert Transform , 2000 .

[29]  Stacey L. Gorniak,et al.  Emerging and disappearing synergies in a hierarchically controlled system , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  R. Elble,et al.  Motor-unit activity responsible for 8- to 12-Hz component of human physiological finger tremor. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Kawato,et al.  Two is better than one: Physical interactions improve motor performance in humans , 2014, Scientific Reports.