Mapping of the sensorimotor cortex: functional MR and magnetic source imaging.

PURPOSE To assess the reliability and comparability of functional MR imaging and magnetic source imaging for mapping the somatosensory cortex. METHODS Parallel studies were performed in eight volunteer subjects in whom both hemispheres were measured with the use of painless tactile stimulation of the tip of each index finger. Magnetic source imaging was performed using a 37-channel biomagnetometer; evoked magnetic fields were analyzed using the single-equivalent dipole representation to ascertain the neuronal source. Functional MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T MR unit. Blocks of images during periods of rest and activation were acquired using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging. Correlation analysis identified pixels in which signal intensity correlated with the stimulus function. A subsequent requirement for spatial connectivity of activation was imposed to reduce the random occurrence of pixels satisfying the correlation criteria. RESULTS Using temporal and spatial statistical criteria for activation, we found that functional MR imaging showed activation in 1 of 16 hemispheres. In three cases, this was accompanied by activity either frontally or ipsilateral to the stimulus. Magnetic source imaging showed parietal contralateral location in all 16 cases. Where successful localization was achieved with both methods, the separation between sources appeared to be between 1 and 4 cm. Functional MR imaging localizations tended to lie more superficially than the magnetic source imaging localizations. Performance of a simple motor task, rather than use of somatosensory stimulation, resulted in a cortical signal change detectable with a similar functional MR imaging approach in all cases, suggesting the more robust nature of this stimulus. CONCLUSIONS Functional mapping of the somatosensory cortex can be achieved with functional MR imaging or magnetic source imaging. Functional MR imaging yields more spurious locations and fails to show localization more often. If neuronal signal propagation pathways are of interest, the temporal resolution of functional MR imaging alone may be inadequate. A combination of magnetic source imaging and functional MR imaging may allow improved sensitivity, fewer false-positive results, and high spatial and temporal resolution.

[1]  F E Bloom,et al.  Intrasubject reliability and validity of somatosensory source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Raichle,et al.  Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Donald R. DuRousseau,et al.  Imaging the spatiotemporal dynamics of cognition with high‐resolution evoked potential methods , 1994 .

[4]  V M Haughton,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of somatosensory stimulation. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[5]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: In vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  K. Kwong Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging. , 1995, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[7]  W W Orrison,et al.  Neuromagnetic mapping of brain function. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  R Hari,et al.  Magnetic evoked fields of the human brain: basic principles and applications. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[9]  F. Bloom,et al.  Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods. , 1993, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  Visual evoked electrical and magnetic response to half‐field stimulation using pattern reversal stimulation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  R D Bucholz,et al.  Presurgical localization of functional cortex using magnetic source imaging. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Nudleman Kl,et al.  Transcranial Doppler study. , 1991 .

[14]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Localization of human sensorimotor cortex during surgery by cortical surface recording of somatosensory evoked potentials. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  N. Barbaro,et al.  Correlation of functional magnetic source imaging with intraoperative cortical stimulation in neurosurgical patients. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[17]  M. Mintun,et al.  Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity. , 1988, Science.

[18]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Reproducibility and Validity of Neuromagnetic Source Localization Using A Large Array Biomagnetometer , 1991 .

[19]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[20]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. Frahm,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of human brain oxygenation during rest and photic stimulation , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging studies of frontal cortex activation during word generation in humans. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D H Fender,et al.  Methods for the localization of electrical sources in the human brain. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[24]  R R Edelman,et al.  Echo-planar MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[25]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Gore,et al.  Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  F E Bloom,et al.  Noninvasive presurgical neuromagnetic mapping of somatosensory cortex. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[28]  J. Kucharczyk,et al.  Applications of magnetic source imaging to presurgical brain mapping. , 1995, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[29]  J. Hennig,et al.  Observation of a fast response in functional MR , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  R. Hari On Brain's Magnetic Responses to Sensory Stimuli , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[31]  E. Haacke,et al.  Identification of vascular structures as a major source of signal contrast in high resolution 2D and 3D functional activation imaging of the motor cortex at l.5T preliminary results , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  B. Rosen,et al.  Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: Theory and experiment , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  C. Jack,et al.  Sensory motor cortex: correlation of presurgical mapping with functional MR imaging and invasive cortical mapping. , 1994, Radiology.