The masking-level difference in low-noise noise.

In experiment 1 NoSo and NoS pi thresholds for a 500-Hz pure tone were obtained in a low-fluctuation masking noise and a high-fluctuation masking noise for six normal-hearing listeners. The noise bandwidth was 10 Hz. In agreement with previous investigations, the NoSo thresholds were lower in low-fluctuation noise than in high-fluctuation noise. For three listeners, NoS pi thresholds were similar for the two types of noise, while for the other three listeners, Nos pi thresholds were higher for low-fluctuation noise than for high-fluctuation noise. In experiment 2, the masker was created by amplitude modulating a 500-Hz pure tone by a 0-10-Hz low-pass noise. The degree of masker fluctuation was controlled by adjusting the average modulation depth (100%, 63%, 40%, and 25%). The signal was a 10-Hz-wide noise centered on 500 Hz. Results were similar to those of experiment 1: for the NoSo conditions, signal detection improved with decreasing degree of fluctuation, and for NoS pi conditions, the results were subject dependent. For three listeners, NoS pi thresholds were again similar in the two types of noise, while for the other three listeners, NoS pi thresholds were again higher in low-fluctuation noise than in high-fluctuation noise. The results showed that a high degree of masker fluctuation sometimes facilitates NoS pi detection. It is possible that the binaural detection mechanism utilizes the relatively good signal-to-noise ratios that occur in the low power or "dip" regions of fluctuating masker waveforms.

[1]  David M. Green,et al.  Interaural Phase Effects in the Masking of Signals of Different Durations , 1966 .

[2]  R H Gilkey,et al.  Effects of masker waveform and signal-to-masker phase relation on diotic and dichotic masking by reproducible noise. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. Florentine,et al.  Stimulus-driven, time-varying weights for comodulation masking release. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J Blauert,et al.  On the lag of lateralization caused by interaural time and intensity differences. , 1972, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Detection of tones in low-noise noise : further evidence for the role of envelope fluctuations , 1997 .

[6]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Relation of masked threshold to signal-duration for various interaural phasecombinations. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Richard M. Stern,et al.  The Role of Consistency of Interaural Timing Over Frequency in Binaural Lateralization , 1992 .

[8]  So,et al.  Stimulus‐driven, time‐varying weights for comodulation masking release , 1995 .

[9]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Frederic L. Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differencesa) , 1978 .

[13]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. I. General strategy and preliminary results on interaural discrimination. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based in auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E. de Boer,et al.  Masking and Discrimination , 1966 .

[16]  Arnold M. Small,et al.  Masking with narrow‐band FM noise , 1974 .

[17]  N. Durlach Equalization and Cancellation Theory of Binaural Masking‐Level Differences , 1963 .

[18]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .

[21]  Jon Pumplin,et al.  Low‐noise noise , 1985 .

[22]  Thomas E. Hanna,et al.  Phase effects for a sine wave masked by reproducible noise , 1985 .

[23]  R H Gilkey,et al.  Models of auditory masking: a molecular psychophysical approach. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.