A near‐bottom magnetic survey of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge axis at 26°N: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the TAG segment

[1] An extensive deep-tow magnetic survey of the TAG ridge segment on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge reveals new information about the relationship between the magnetic anomaly field and the TAG hydrothermal deposits. Results show the strongest magnetization is located over the neovolcanic axis and asymmetrically toward the western side of the central Brunhes anomaly. A well-defined linear magnetization low is located over the eastern rift valley wall of the TAG segment. The near-bottom data show no direct correlation between this crustal magnetization low and the hydrothermal deposits. The magnetization low is explained by crustal thinning caused by 4 km of horizontal extension along a normal fault. Previous observations and sampling indicate exposures of gabbros and dikes in the eastern rift valley wall, suggesting slip along a normal fault has revealed this crust. Modeling suggests the fault has been active since 0.35 ± 0.1 Ma at a horizontal slip rate of roughly half the spreading rate of 22 km/Myr. The TAG hydrothermal system is located on the hanging wall of this fault within 3 km of its termination. Over the past several hundred thousand years, movement on the detachment fault may have episodically increased the permeability of the hanging wall reactivating the overlying hydrothermal systems. Significant vents like TAG may be typically associated with hanging walls of long-term detachment faults near seafloor spreading centers. This would imply that it is the reactivation of permeability in the hanging wall related to repeated fault movement that controls the longevity of these hydrothermal systems.

[1]  J. Lavelle,et al.  Magnetic anomaly patterns on Mid‐Atlantic Ridge crest at 26°N , 1977 .

[2]  P. Rona,et al.  Magnetic properties and opaque mineralogy of rocks from selected seafloor hydrothermal sites at oceanic ridges , 1990 .

[3]  S. Humphris,et al.  Structural control on sea-floor hydrothermal activity at the TAG active mound , 1996, Nature.

[4]  P. Rona,et al.  Black smokers, massive sulphides and vent biota at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1986, Nature.

[5]  S. Humphris,et al.  A synthesis of geological and geochemical investigations of the TAG hydrothermal field: Insights into fluid-flow and mixing processes in a hydrothermal system , 2000 .

[6]  P. Patriat,et al.  Kinematics of the North American-African plate boundary between 28° and 29°N during the last 10 Ma: evolution of the axial geometry and spreading rate and direction , 1992 .

[7]  S. P. Miller,et al.  Three‐dimensional modeling of a magnetic reversal boundary from inversion of deep‐tow measurements , 1980 .

[8]  L. Zonenshain,et al.  Tectonics of the Mid-Atlantic rift valley between the TAG and MARK areas (26 24°N): Evidence for vertical tectonism , 1989 .

[9]  S. N. White,et al.  New Observations on the Distribution of Past and Present Hydrothermal Activity in the TAG Area of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (26°08′ N) , 1998 .

[10]  M. Tivey,et al.  Magnetization of 0–29 Ma ocean crust on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 25°30′ to 27°10′N , 1998 .

[11]  H. S. Fleming,et al.  Mesozoic plate motions in the eastern central North Atlantic , 1973 .

[12]  P. Rona.  Magnetic signatures of hydrothermal alteration and volcanogenic mineral deposits in oceanic crust , 1978 .

[13]  M. Tivey,et al.  Reduced crustal magnetization beneath the active sulfide mound, TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 26°N , 1993 .

[14]  J. Reyss,et al.  Hydrothermal activity on a 105‐year scale at a slow‐spreading ridge, TAG hydrothermal field, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge 26°N , 1995 .

[15]  Deborah K. Smith,et al.  The role of seamount volcanism in crustal construction at the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge (24°–30°N) , 1992 .

[16]  J. Sempere,et al.  Segmentation of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between 24° N and 30°40' N , 1990, Nature.

[17]  S. Cande,et al.  Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic , 1995 .

[18]  S. Humphris,et al.  Active vents and massive sulfides at 26 degrees N (TAG) and 23 degrees N (Snakepit) on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1988 .

[19]  C. You,et al.  Evolution of an active sea-floor massive sulphide deposit , 1998, Nature.

[20]  M. Mottl,et al.  Hydrothermal activity at the Trans‐Atlantic Geotraverse Hydrothermal Field, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge crest at 26°N , 1984 .

[21]  J. Goff,et al.  Segmentation and crustal structure of the western Mid-Atlantic Ridge flank, 25°25′–27°10′N and 0–29 m.y. , 1997 .

[22]  J. Karson,et al.  Block-tilting, transfer faults, and structural control of magmatic and hydrothermal processesin the TAG area, Mid-Atlantic Ridge 26°N , 1990 .

[23]  R. Parker,et al.  The inversion of magnetic anomalies in the presence of topography , 1974 .

[24]  Jun Korenaga,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of marine magnetic vector anomalies , 1995 .

[25]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[26]  M. Tivey,et al.  Reduced crustal magnetization beneath Relict Hydrothermal Mounds: TAG Hydrothermal Field, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge, 26°N , 1996 .

[27]  P. Rona,et al.  The TAG hydrothermal field , 1974, Nature.

[28]  Jean-Pierre Valet,et al.  Global changes in intensity of the Earth's magnetic field during the past 800 kyr , 1999, Nature.

[29]  C. V. Raman,et al.  Active and relict sea-floor hydrothermal mineralization at the TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1993 .

[30]  M. Mottl,et al.  Morphology, mineralogy and chemistry of hydrothermal deposits from the TAG area, 26°N Mid-Atlantic Ridge☆ , 1985 .

[31]  S. Humphris,et al.  ACTIVE VENTS AND MASSIVE SULFIDES AT 26ON (TAG) AND 23ON (SNAKEPITI ON THE MID.ATLANTIC RIDGE , 1988 .

[32]  P. Rona,et al.  Rapidly accumulating manganese deposit from the Median Valley of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge , 1974 .

[33]  Jian Lin,et al.  A geological model for the structure of ridge segments in slow spreading ocean crust , 1994 .

[34]  K. E. Moore,et al.  A season of heat, water vapor, total hydrocarbon, and ozone fluxes at a subarctic fen , 1994 .

[35]  D. Bohnenstiehl,et al.  Fissuring near the TAG active hydrothermal mound, 26°N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2000 .

[36]  K. Klitgord.  Sea-floor spreading: The central anomaly magnetization high , 1976 .

[37]  P. Rona,et al.  Tectonic fabric and hydrothermal activity of Mid-Atlantic Ridge crest (lat 26°N) , 1976 .

[38]  S. Solomon,et al.  Microearthquake Characteristics of a Mid‐Ocean Ridge along‐axis high , 1992 .

[39]  J. Escartín,et al.  Extremely asymmetric magmatic accretion of oceanic crust at the ends of slow-spreading ridge segments , 2000 .

[40]  J. Sempere,et al.  Segmentation and morphotectonic variations along a slow-spreading center: The Mid-Atlantic Ridge (24°00′ N– 30°40′ N) , 1993 .

[41]  M. Hannington,et al.  Relict hydrothermal zones in the TAG Hydrothermal Field, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge 26°N, 45°W , 1993 .

[42]  J. Shaw,et al.  Experimental reassessment of the Shaw paleointensity method using laboratory‐induced thermal remanent magnetization , 2002 .

[43]  M. Tivey,et al.  Magnetic modeling near selected areas of hydrothermal activity on the Mid‐Atlantic and Gorda Ridges , 1992 .

[44]  H. Johnson,et al.  Variations in oceanic crustal magnetization: Systematic changes in the last 160 million years , 1993 .

[45]  R. Langel.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1991 revision , 1991 .

[46]  F. Guspí.  Frequency-domain reduction of potential field measurements to a horizontal plane , 1987 .

[47]  Iaga Division.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 Revision , 1995 .

[48]  M. Tivey,et al.  Crustal magnetization reveals subsurface structure of Juan de Fuca Ridge hydrothermal vent fields , 2002 .

[49]  A. P. Lisitsyn,et al.  HYDROTHERMAL PHENOMENA IN THE MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE AT LAT. 26°N (TAG HYDROTHERMAL FIELD) , 1989 .

[50]  C. Radhakrishnamurty.  Variations in magnetization intensity of ocean floor basalts , 1983, Nature.