Auditor analytical review judgement: a performance evaluation

Abstract This study provides experimental evidence on several important measures for evaluating the performance of auditor judgement in an analytical review (AR) context. The results of the study suggest that UK auditors demonstrated only moderate level of judgement performance, as measured by consensus, consistency, and self-insight. Contrary to what might be expected, the study did not find that auditors from larger firms exhibited relatively greater consensus. In order to identify experience effects the paper employs the ‘expertise paradigm’ [Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (1993) 425]. Significant experience effects were identified implying that auditor judgement performance might be improved if less straightforward judgements were to be made by more senior auditors than is currently the case. The results of the study may have implications for both the cost structures and staffing policies of audit firms.

[1]  Steven E. Kaplan.  The Effect of Combining Compliance and Substantive Tasks on Auditor Consensus , 1985 .

[2]  Edward Blocher,et al.  Analytical Review: A Guide to Evaluating Financial Statements , 1984 .

[3]  Robert Libby,et al.  Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation , 1993 .

[4]  William F. Wright,et al.  Internal Control Judgments And Effects Of Experience - Replications And Extensions , 1982 .

[5]  Philip Yetton,et al.  The Effect Of The Review Process On Auditor Judgments , 1985 .

[6]  Stuart Manson,et al.  Audit Automation in the UK and the Us: A Comparative Study , 1998 .

[7]  William F. Wright.  Task Experience as a Predictor of Superior Loan Loss Judgments , 2001 .

[8]  Christina Mulligan,et al.  The Use of Analytical Procedures in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[9]  Edward J. Joyce,et al.  Expert Judgment In Audit Program Planning , 1976 .

[10]  Bruce R. Gaumnitz,et al.  AUDITOR CONSENSUS IN INTERNAL CONTROL EVALUATION AND AUDIT PROGRAM-PLANNING , 1982 .

[11]  R. K. Mautz,et al.  The philosophy of auditing , 1961 .

[12]  P. Slovic.  Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process. , 1969 .

[13]  Robert Libby,et al.  Expertise And Auditors Judgments Of Conjunctive Events , 1986 .

[14]  David Hatherly,et al.  An empirical investigation of the use of analytical review by external auditors , 1997 .

[15]  Sarah E. Bonner.  Judgment and Decision‐Making Research in Accounting , 1999 .

[16]  Timothy B. Bell,et al.  Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens : the KPMG Business Measurement Process , 1997 .

[17]  Clive S. Lennox,et al.  Are large auditors more accurate than small auditors , 1999 .

[18]  Ron Weber,et al.  Auditor Decision Making on Overall System Reliability: Accuracy, Consensus, and the Usefulness of a Simulation Decision Aid , 1978 .

[19]  Ken T. Trotman.  Audit judgment research—Issues addressed, research methods and future directions , 1998 .

[20]  Thomas Kida,et al.  The Impact of Analytical Review Results, Internal Control Reliability, and Experience on Auditors' Use of Analytical Review , 1989 .

[21]  Jerry R. Strawser,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF AUDITOR JUDGMENTS OF THE EFFECT OF PRELIMINARY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ON THE EXTENT OF SUBSTANTIVE TESTING , 1992 .

[22]  Ira Solomon,et al.  Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing: Judgment and decision-making research in auditing , 1995 .

[23]  R. Ashton.  An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments , 1974 .

[24]  G. Monroe,et al.  A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment , 2001 .

[25]  Janet L. Colbert.  INHERENT RISK: AN INVESTIGATION OF AUDITORS' JUDGMENTS. , 1988 .

[26]  Barry L. Lewis,et al.  Human information processing research in accounting: The state of the art in 1982 , 1977 .

[27]  Kevin Keasey,et al.  Consensus and accuracy in accounting studies of decision-making: A note on a new measure of consensus , 1989 .

[28]  Bernard Pierce,et al.  Auditor time budget pressure: consequences and antecedents , 1996 .

[29]  Robert Libby,et al.  Accounting and human information processing : theory and applications , 1981 .

[30]  The future of auditing: the debate in the UK , 1999 .

[31]  Steven E. Kaplan,et al.  The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments , 1995 .

[32]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .