Implementation of Plate Imaging for Demonstration of Monoclonality in Biologics Manufacturing Development

Monoclonality of mammalian cell lines used for production of biologics is a regulatory expectation and one of the attributes assessed as part of a larger process to ensure consistent quality of the biologic. Historically, monoclonality has been demonstrated through statistics generated from limiting dilution cloning or through verified flow cytometry methods. A variety of new technologies are now on the market with the potential to offer more efficient and robust approaches to generating and documenting a clonal cell line. Here we present an industry perspective on approaches for the application of imaging and integration of that information into a regulatory submission to support a monoclonality claim. These approaches represent the views of a consortium of companies within the BioPhorum Development Group and include case studies utilising imaging technology that apply scientifically sound approaches and efforts in demonstrating monoclonality. By highlighting both the utility of these alternative approaches and the advantages they bring over the traditional methods, as well as their adoption by industry leaders, we hope to encourage acceptance of their use within the biologics cell line development space and provide guidance for regulatory submission using these alternative approaches. LAY ABSTRACT: In the manufacture of biologics produced in mammalian cells, one recommendation by regulatory agencies to help ensure product consistency, safety, and efficacy is to produce the material from a monoclonal cell line derived from a single, progenitor cell. The process by which monoclonality is assured can be supplemented with single-well plate images of the progenitor cell. Here we highlight the utility of that imaging technology, describe approaches to verify the validity of those images, and discuss how to analyze that information to support a biologic filing application. This approach serves as an industry perspective to increased regulatory interest within the scope of monoclonality for mammalian cell culture–derived biologics.

[1]  S. Nick,et al.  WHO expert committee on biological standardization. , 1981, World Health Organization technical report series.

[2]  K. Unsicker,et al.  A statistical approach to determine monoclonality after limiting cell plating of a hybridoma clone. , 1985, Journal of immunological methods.

[3]  H. Coller,et al.  Poisson statistical analysis of repetitive subcloning by the limiting dilution technique as a way of assessing hybridoma monoclonality. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[4]  C. Demaria,et al.  Accelerated Clone Selection for Recombinant CHO Cells Using a FACS‐Based High‐Throughput Screen , 2007, Biotechnology progress.

[5]  R. J. Sleiman,et al.  Accelerated cell line development using two‐color fluorescence activated cell sorting to select highly expressing antibody‐producing clones , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  C. Frye,et al.  Industry view on the relative importance of "clonality" of biopharmaceutical-producing cell lines. , 2016, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[7]  B. Snedecor,et al.  Slashing the timelines: Opting to generate high‐titer clonal lines faster via viability‐based single cell sorting , 2016, Biotechnology progress.

[8]  M. A. Henson,et al.  Byproduct Cross Feeding and Community Stability in an In Silico Biofilm Model of the Gut Microbiome , 2017 .

[9]  Jürgen Fieder,et al.  A single-step FACS sorting strategy in conjunction with fluorescent vital dye imaging efficiently assures clonality of biopharmaceutical production cell lines. , 2017, Biotechnology journal.

[10]  F. Wurm,et al.  Cloning of CHO Cells, Productivity and Genetic Stability—A Discussion , 2017 .

[11]  Andy Lin,et al.  Development and characterization of an automated imaging workflow to generate clonally‐derived cell lines for therapeutic proteins , 2018, Biotechnology progress.