Increasing the Capacity of Large-Scale HetNets through Centralized Dynamic Data Offloading

Typically, mobile users cluster around points of interest in dense urban environments such as city centers forming so-called data traffic hot spots and hot zones. To provide capacity to such users efficiently, mobile operators deploy small cells. However, the deployment of heterogeneous networks, which consist of overlaying macro cells and many co-channel small cells, entails many problems. One typical problem is that, more often than not, hot spot users are not covered by the small cells due to the spatially fluctuating nature of the traffic demand. Data offloading, meaning actively shifting macro cell users to small cells, is a promising approach to address this issue. In this paper, we extend a queuing- theoretic model based on the notion of elastic data flows in order to model data offloading, or more specifically, cell range expansion along with inter-cell interference coordination. The model explicitly considers mutual co-channel interference and enables predicting the performance of networks consisting of hundreds of cells with very low computational effort. Based on this model, we present a heuristic centralized data offloading algorithm, which, for a certain traffic demand, is able to increase the 5th percentile of the data flow throughput by a factor of 4.5 and to halve the probability of service unavailability. Moreover, we show that the network capacity can be increased by about 41.3% if data offloading is performed.

[1]  Nageen Himayat,et al.  Interference management for 4G cellular standards [WIMAX/LTE UPDATE] , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Admission control in interference-coupled wireless data networks: A queuing theory-based network model , 2014, 2014 12th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[3]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Performance Analysis of Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination in LTE-Advanced Heterogeneous Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[4]  Albrecht J. Fehske,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvements through Micro Sites in Cellular Mobile Radio Networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[5]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  LTE Capacity Compared to the Shannon Bound , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[6]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  CRS interference cancellation in heterogeneous networks for LTE-Advanced downlink , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Ingo Viering,et al.  Simplified Scheduler Model for SON Algorithms of eICIC in Heterogeneous Networks , 2014 .

[8]  J. W. Roberts Traffic theory and the Internet , 2001 .

[9]  Thomas Bonald,et al.  Flow-level performance analysis of some opportunistic scheduling algorithms , 2005, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[10]  Zwi Altman,et al.  Self-organizing femtocell offloading at the flow level , 2013, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[11]  Kurt Majewski,et al.  Conservative Cell Load Approximation for Radio Networks with Shannon Channels and its Application to LTE Network Planning , 2010, 2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications.

[12]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Flow-level models for capacity planning and management in interference-coupled wireless data networks , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  On flow level modeling of multi-cell wireless networks , 2013, 2013 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[14]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives , 1964, Comput. J..