The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Parr,et al. Face Perception in Non-Human Primates , 2011 .
[2] L. Parr,et al. The evolution of face processing in primates , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[3] W. Dittrich. Representation of Faces in Longtailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) , 2010 .
[4] L. Parr,et al. Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: A comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys , 2009, Brain and Cognition.
[5] G. Yovel,et al. Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[6] R. Hampton,et al. Thatcher Effect in Monkeys Demonstrates Conservation of Face Perception across Primates , 2009, Current Biology.
[7] Elinor McKone,et al. Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space , 2009, Cognition.
[8] Christoph D. Dahl,et al. Humans and Macaques Employ Similar Face-Processing Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.
[9] E. McKone,et al. Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances , 2009, Vision Research.
[10] L. Parr,et al. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[11] B. Rossion. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[12] L. Parr,et al. Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle , 2008, Animal Cognition.
[13] Y. Sugita. Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] Christoph D. Dahl,et al. Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[15] Rachel A Robbins,et al. No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.
[16] J. Neiworth,et al. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors , 2007, Animal Cognition.
[17] L. Parr,et al. The Perception of Unfamiliar Faces and Houses by Chimpanzees: Influence of Rotation Angle , 2006, Perception.
[18] S. de Schonen,et al. Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. , 2004, Developmental science.
[19] D. Maurer,et al. Developmental changes in face processing skills. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[20] D. Maurer,et al. The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[21] Jerald D. Kralik,et al. Face processing in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) , 2001, Animal Cognition.
[22] A. Freire,et al. The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.
[23] J. Winslow,et al. Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face-specific? , 1999, Animal Cognition.
[24] M. Tomonaga. Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) , 1999, Primates.
[25] M. Tarr,et al. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[26] C. Hamilton,et al. Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[27] L. Parr,et al. Why Faces May Be Special: Evidence of the Inversion Effect in Chimpanzees , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[28] M. Tarr,et al. Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.
[29] M. Tomonaga. How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: Evidence for an inversion effect in face perception , 1994, Primates.
[30] G. Rhodes,et al. What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.
[31] J. Bartlett,et al. Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[32] M. Farah,et al. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[33] G. Rhodes,et al. Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.
[34] T. Valentine. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.
[35] A. Young,et al. Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.
[36] S. Carey,et al. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[37] C. Bruce,et al. Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect , 1982, Neuropsychologia.
[38] Robert W. Doty,et al. Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces , 1982, Neuropsychologia.
[39] P. Thompson,et al. Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.
[40] G. V. Hoesen,et al. Face recognition in the rhesus monkey , 1979, Neuropsychologia.
[41] R. Yin. Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .
[42] M. Peterson,et al. Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition , 2008, Animal Cognition.
[43] Masaki Tomonaga,et al. Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties , 2006, Primates.
[44] Katalin M. Gothard,et al. How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task? , 2004, Animal Cognition.