A primitive study of logrolling in e-negotiation

E-negotiation involves two or more agents multilaterally bargaining for mutual gain, using information technologies in a cooperative problem-solving (CPS) environment. This paper only focuses on integrative negotiations. For example, one party reaches its goals and the other party also gains benefits. One of the strategies for achieving integrative solutions is called logrolling. Logrolling in two-issue two-party negotiation is defined as the exchange of loss in one issue for gain in other issues that result in an increase of the overall value for both parties. Each party can increase the overall value by trading the less preferred issue for the more preferred, provided that a trade-off ratio is satisfactory. Traditionally, the concept of logrolling has only been applied in the trading of votes by legislators. For example, a legislator offers to another to trade his vote on a certain bill in return for the other's votes on other bills. Not much research work about logrolling has been studied in other research areas such as operation research, information systems and electronic commerce. This paper overview issues of logrolling in the context of e-negotiation. In particular, this paper introduces a linear programming model for optimizing trade-off ratios in the context of two-issue two-party logrolling.

[1]  Miroslaw Berezinski,et al.  Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications , 1985 .

[2]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[3]  L. Thompson Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[4]  L. Thompson,et al.  The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 1997 .

[5]  Robert H. Wilson An Axiomatic Model of Logrolling , 1969 .

[6]  A. Foroughi,et al.  NSS solutions to major negotiation stumbling blocks , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Patrick C. K. Hung,et al.  Modeling e-negotiation activities with Petri nets , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  David M. Kreps Notes On The Theory Of Choice , 1988 .

[9]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[10]  W. Cook,et al.  Ordinal Ranking with Intensity of Preference , 1985 .

[11]  Shing-Chi Cheung,et al.  A Meta-model for e-Contract Template Variable Dependencies Facilitating e-Negotiation , 2002, ER.

[12]  Lewis A. Froman,et al.  Research reports. Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes , 1970 .

[13]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[14]  Jane M. Fraser,et al.  A New Method to Teach Multi-Attribute Utility Assessment , 1990 .

[15]  Niall M. Fraser Ordinal preference representations , 1994 .

[16]  Niall M. Fraser,et al.  Modelling Multi-Issue Negotiation , 1998 .

[17]  Von-Wun Soo,et al.  Agent negotiation in trusted third party mediated uncertain games , 2000, AGENTS '00.