UBR box N-recognin-4 (UBR4), an N-recognin of the N-end rule pathway, and its role in yolk sac vascular development and autophagy

The N-end rule pathway is a proteolytic system in which destabilizing N-terminal residues of short-lived proteins act as degradation determinants (N-degrons). Substrates carrying N-degrons are recognized by N-recognins that mediate ubiquitylation-dependent selective proteolysis through the proteasome. Our previous studies identified the mammalian N-recognin family consisting of UBR1/E3α, UBR2, UBR4/p600, and UBR5, which recognize destabilizing N-terminal residues through the UBR box. In the current study, we addressed the physiological function of a poorly characterized N-recognin, 570-kDa UBR4, in mammalian development. UBR4-deficient mice die during embryogenesis and exhibit pleiotropic abnormalities, including impaired vascular development in the yolk sac (YS). Vascular development in UBR4-deficient YS normally advances through vasculogenesis but is arrested during angiogenic remodeling of primary capillary plexus associated with accumulation of autophagic vacuoles. In the YS, UBR4 marks endoderm-derived, autophagy-enriched cells that coordinate differentiation of mesoderm-derived vascular cells and supply autophagy-generated amino acids during early embryogenesis. UBR4 of the YS endoderm is associated with a tissue-specific autophagic pathway that mediates bulk lysosomal proteolysis of endocytosed maternal proteins into amino acids. In cultured cells, UBR4 subpopulation is degraded by autophagy through its starvation-induced association with cellular cargoes destined to autophagic double membrane structures. UBR4 loss results in multiple misregulations in autophagic induction and flux, including synthesis and lipidation/activation of the ubiquitin-like protein LC3 and formation of autophagic double membrane structures. Our results suggest that UBR4 plays an important role in mammalian development, such as angiogenesis in the YS, in part through regulation of bulk degradation by lysosomal hydrolases.

[1]  Yong Tae Kwon,et al.  The N-end rule pathway. , 2012, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  M. Sowa,et al.  Systematic identification of interactions between host cell proteins and E7 oncoproteins from diverse human papillomaviruses , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Yong Tae Kwon,et al.  The N-end rule pathway: emerging functions and molecular principles of substrate recognition , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  N-Terminal Acetylation of Cellular Proteins Creates Specific Degradation Signals , 2010, Science.

[5]  J. Lazo,et al.  The Substrate Recognition Domains of the N-end Rule Pathway* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Y. Nakatani,et al.  Protein 600 Is a Microtubule/Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Protein in CNS Neurons , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Min Jae Lee,et al.  RGS4 and RGS5 are in vivo substrates of the N-end rule pathway. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Korsmeyer,et al.  p600, a unique protein required for membrane morphogenesis and cell survival. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  The N-end rule pathway as a nitric oxide sensor controlling the levels of multiple regulators , 2005, Nature.

[10]  K. Münger,et al.  Bovine papillomavirus E7 transformation function correlates with cellular p600 protein binding. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  K. Münger,et al.  Association of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein with the 600-kDa retinoblastoma protein-associated factor, p600. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Min Jae Lee,et al.  A Family of Mammalian E3 Ubiquitin Ligases That Contain the UBR Box Motif and Recognize N-Degrons , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[13]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Female Lethality and Apoptosis of Spermatocytes in Mice Lacking the UBR2 Ubiquitin Ligase of the N-End Rule Pathway , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  An Essential Role of N-Terminal Arginylation in Cardiovascular Development , 2002, Science.

[15]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Construction and Analysis of Mouse Strains Lacking the Ubiquitin Ligase UBR1 (E3α) of the N-End Rule Pathway , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  V. Denenberg,et al.  Altered Activity, Social Behavior, and Spatial Memory in Mice Lacking the NTAN1p Amidase and the Asparagine Branch of the N-End Rule Pathway , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  Yong Tae Kwon,et al.  Alternative Splicing Results in Differential Expression, Activity, and Localization of the Two Forms of Arginyl-tRNA-Protein Transferase, a Component of the N-End Rule Pathway , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  N. Copeland,et al.  The mouse and human genes encoding the recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. , 1986, Science.

[20]  J. Lloyd,et al.  Evidence that protein ingested by the rat visceral yolk sac yields amino acids for synthesis of embryonic protein. , 1983, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[21]  D A New,et al.  WHOLE‐EMBRYO CULTURE AND THE STUDY OF MAMMALIAN EMBRYOS DURING ORGANOGENESIS , 1978, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  C. Fader,et al.  Autophagy and multivesicular bodies: two closely related partners , 2009, Cell Death and Differentiation.