The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons

Herrnstein and Loveland (1964, pp. 549–551) successfully trained pigeons to discriminate pictures showing humans from pictures that did not. In the present study, a go/no-go procedure was employed to replicate and extend their findings, the primary focus of concern being to reevaluate the role of item- and category-specific information. The pigeons readily acquired the discrimination and were also able to generalize to novel instances of the two classes (Experiment 1). Classification of scrambled versions of the stimuli was based on small and local features, rather than on configural and global features (Experiment 2). The presentation of gray-scale stimuli indicated that color was important for classifying novel stimuli and recognizing familiar ones (Experiments 1 and 2). Finally, the control that could possibly be exerted by irrelevant background features was investigated by presenting the pigeons with images of persons contained in former person-absent pictures (Experiment 3). Classification was found to be controlled by both item- and category- specific features, but only in pigeons that were reinforced on person-present pictures was the latter type of information given precedence over the former.

[1]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. , 1988 .

[2]  W. K. Honig,et al.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  John Cerella,et al.  The pigeon's analysis of pictures , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Charles A. Edwards,et al.  Memorization and “feature selection” in the acquisition of natural concepts in pigeons☆ , 1987 .

[5]  J. Mollon "Tho' she kneel'd in that place where they grew..." The uses and origins of primate colour vision. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Richard W. Malott,et al.  Acquisition of the People Concept in Pigeons , 1972 .

[7]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[8]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[9]  G. Legge,et al.  Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision , 1993 .

[10]  E. Hearst,et al.  Food delivery as a conditional stimulus: Feature-learning and memory in pigeons. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Pigeon concept formation: successive and simultaneous acquisition. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  Catriona M. E. Ryan,et al.  Discrimination of Five-Dimensional Stimuli by Pigeons: Limitations of Feature Analysis , 1993 .

[13]  K J Holyoak,et al.  Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  M. Jitsumori A prototype effect and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  Discrimination learning with the distinctive feature on positive or negative trials , 1970 .

[16]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Parallel search for a conjunction of color and orientation: The effect of spatial proximity , 1996 .

[17]  S. Palmer Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[18]  Effect of proximity of elements on the feature-positive effect. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  Fetterman Jg Dimensions of stimulus complexity. , 1996 .

[20]  G. H. Jacobs THE DISTRIBUTION AND NATURE OF COLOUR VISION AMONG THE MAMMALS , 1993, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  A Test of the Linear Feature Model of Polymorphous Concept Discrimination with Pigeons , 1993 .

[23]  R. Lubow,et al.  High-order concept formation in the pigeon. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  D. Blackman,et al.  Fixed versus variable sequences of food and stimulus presentation in second-order schedules. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  K. Manabe,et al.  The Feature-Positive Effect based on Positional Discrimination in Pigeons , 1982 .

[26]  F RESTLE,et al.  Theory of selective learning with probable reinforcements. , 1957, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  M. R. D'Amato,et al.  The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1988 .

[29]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  LIMITS OF SYMMETRY CONCEPTUALIZATION IN PIGEONS , 1999 .

[30]  G. Nallan,et al.  Feature-positive and feature-negative learning in the rhesus monkey and pigeon. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  D. G. Lander,et al.  The pigeon’s concept of pigeon , 1971 .

[32]  D S Blough,et al.  Pigeon perception of letters of the alphabet. , 1982, Science.

[33]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic , 1983 .

[34]  Martin Fieder,et al.  Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[35]  E. Brenner,et al.  What does a pigeon see in a picasso? , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.