Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes

Forest resource information has a hierarchical structure: individual tree attributes are summed at the plot level and then in turn, plot-level estimates are used to derive stand or large-area estimates of forest resources. Due to this hierarchy, it is imperative that individual tree attributes are measured with accuracy and precision. With the widespread use of different measurement tools, it is also important to understand the expected degree of precision associated with these measurements. The most prevalent tree attributes measured in the field are tree species, stem diameter-at-breast-height (dbh), and tree height. For dbh and height, the most commonly used measuring devices are calipers and clinometers, respectively. The aim of our study was to characterize the precision of individual tree dbh and height measurements in boreal forest conditions when using calipers and clinometers. The data consisted of 319 sample trees at a study area in Evo, southern Finland. The sample trees were measured independently by four trained mensurationists. The standard deviation in tree dbh and height measurements was 0.3 cm (1.5%) and 0.5 m (2.9%), respectively. Precision was also assessed by tree species and tree size classes; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the mensurationists for dbh or height measurements. Our study offers insights into the expected precision of tree dbh and height as measured with the most commonly used devices. These results are important when using sample plot data in forest inventory applications, especially now, at a time when new tree attribute measurement techniques based on remote sensing are being developed and compared to the conventional caliper and clinometer measurements.

[1]  Manfred Näslund,et al.  Skogsförsöksanstaltens gallringsförsök i tallskog , 1936 .

[2]  F. J. Richards.  A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[3]  Pentti Roiko-Jokela,et al.  Koepuiden mittauksen tarkkuus ja tehokkuus. , 1978 .

[4]  Stephen A. Y. Omule.  Personal bias in forest measurements. , 1980 .

[5]  R. M. Kellogg,et al.  Stem eccentricity in coastal western hemlock , 1981 .

[6]  Jouko Laasasenaho.  Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch [Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Betula pubescens] , 1982 .

[7]  James E. Johnson,et al.  Reliability of Height and Diameter Remeasurements on Red Pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) Seedlings , 1985 .

[8]  B. Matérn.  On the shape of the cross-section of a tree stem. An empirical study of the geometry of mensurational methods. , 1990 .

[9]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  Five instruments for measuring tree height: an evaluation , 1994 .

[10]  Ronald E. McRoberts,et al.  Variation in forest inventory field measurements , 1994 .

[11]  David Pothier,et al.  Comparison of relative accuracy and time requirement between the caliper, the diameter tape and an electronic tree measuring fork , 1995 .

[12]  Accuracy and precision of two laser dendrometers , 1998 .

[13]  Thomas G. Matney,et al.  Comparison of Optical Dendrometers for Prediction of Standing Tree Volume , 1999 .

[14]  Daniel L. Schmoldt,et al.  A Review of Past Research on Dendrometers , 2000, Forest Science.

[15]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[16]  A first look at measurement error on FIA plots using blind plots in the Pacific Northwest , 2002 .

[17]  Field Note—Comparison of Three Dendrometers in Measuring Diameter at Breast Height Field Note , 2002 .

[18]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[19]  H. Spiecker,et al.  AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION OF FOREST INVENTORY PARAMETERS USING TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2003 .

[20]  E. Næsset.  Accuracy of forest inventory using airborne laser scanning: evaluating the first nordic full-scale operational project , 2004 .

[21]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[22]  E. Næsset.  Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[23]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data , 2005 .

[24]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Evaluation of the Laser-relascope , 2005 .

[25]  C. Elzinga,et al.  Observer variation in tree diameter measurements. , 2005 .

[26]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[27]  J. Heikkonen,et al.  Digital horizontal tree measurements for forest inventory , 2006 .

[28]  P. Radtke,et al.  Detailed Stem Measurements of Standing Trees from Ground-Based Scanning Lidar , 2006, Forest Science.

[29]  Mahadev Sharma,et al.  Height–diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach , 2007 .

[30]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2008 .

[31]  Tree Heights and Upper Stem Diameters , 2008 .

[32]  Relative effects of dendrometers on the estimation of diameter at breast height, stand basal area and stand volume in uneven-aged northern hardwoods. , 2009 .

[33]  N. J. Tate,et al.  Estimating tree and stand variables in a Corsican Pine woodland from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2009 .

[34]  E. Næsset,et al.  Assessing effects of positioning errors and sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data. , 2009 .

[35]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  LASER-BASED FIELD MEASUREMENTS IN TREE-LEVEL FOREST DATA ACQUISITION , 2009 .

[36]  Nobuya Mizoue,et al.  Effects of training for inexperienced surveyors on data quality of tree diameter and height measurements , 2010 .

[37]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest , 2010 .

[38]  M. Zasada,et al.  Comparing the Use of Three Dendrometers for Measuring Diameters at Breast Height , 2011 .

[39]  P. Gong,et al.  Automated methods for measuring DBH and tree heights with a commercial scanning lidar , 2011 .

[40]  Out .. of.·Roundness in Douglas .. fir Stems , 2011 .

[41]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic Stem Mapping by Merging Several Terrestrial Laser Scans at the Feature and Decision Levels , 2013, Sensors.

[42]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update , 2013 .

[43]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Fast Automatic Precision Tree Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[44]  Helene C. Muller-Landau,et al.  Measuring tree height: a quantitative comparison of two common field methods in a moist tropical forest , 2013 .

[45]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  The Use of a Mobile Laser Scanning System for Mapping Large Forest Plots , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[46]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  The Use of a Hand-Held Camera for Individual Tree 3D Mapping in Forest Sample Plots , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[47]  Hannu Hyyppä,et al.  Accuracy in estimation of timber assortments and stem distribution - A comparison of airborne and terrestrial laser scanning techniques , 2014 .

[48]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Multisource Single-Tree Inventory in the Prediction of Tree Quality Variables and Logging Recoveries , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[49]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automated Stem Curve Measurement Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[50]  Jonathan P. Sheppard,et al.  Highly Accurate Tree Models Derived from Terrestrial Laser Scan Data: A Method Description , 2014 .

[51]  Arun Kumar Pratihast,et al.  Combining Satellite Data and Community-Based Observations for Forest Monitoring , 2014 .

[52]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Urban-Tree-Attribute Update Using Multisource Single-Tree Inventory , 2014 .

[53]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Evaluation of a Smartphone App for Forest Sample Plot Measurements , 2015 .

[54]  Matthieu Molinier,et al.  Relasphone - Mobile and Participative In Situ Forest Biomass Measurements Supporting Satellite Image Mapping , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[55]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Effects of field plot configurations on the uncertainties of ALS-assisted forest resource estimates , 2017 .