Interactions between reduced rate of imazethapyr and multiple weed species-soyabean interference in a semi-arid environment

Yousefi AR, Gonzalez-Andujar JL, Alizadeh H, Baghestani MA, Rahimian H & Karimmojeni H (2012). Interactions between reduced rate of imazethapyr and multiple weed species–soyabean interference in a semi-arid environment. Weed Research.52, 242–251. Summary Field experiments were conducted to evaluate Xanthium strumarium and Amaranthus retroflexus competitive ability with soyabean under unsprayed and sprayed (half the recommended rate of imazethapyr) conditions. Weed density combinations of 0, 4, 8 or 12 plants m−1 of row for A. retroflexus and 0, 2, 4 or 8 plants m−1 of row for X. strumarium were established alone, and in all possible combinations. When X. strumarium and A. retroflexus were grown at the same density, X. strumarium contributed 60–69% of the total weed biomass depending on weed density. The half rate of imazethapyr reduced the biomass of both weed species by 90% as compared with untreated plots. Untreated A. retroflexus and X. strumarium reduced soyabean yields to 1911 kg and 1656 kg ha−1, respectively, while with the reduced rate of herbicide, the yield only decreased to 3612 kg and 3453 kg ha−1 respectively. The total weed density required to cause a 5% soyabean yield loss was 0.16 and 0.32 plants m−1 of row with no-herbicide treatment, while with the half rate of imazethapyr, it increased up to 2.78 and 4.32 plants m−1 in 2007 and 2008 respectively. Owing to the higher competitive ability of X. strumarium, it should be given a greater priority for control than A. retroflexus in soyabean grown in a semi-arid environment. The half rate of herbicide significantly decreased the competitive ability of X. strumarium and A. retroflexus indicating that, in soyabean, application of this rate might be more cost-effective and more environment-friendly than the recommended ones.

[1]  J. González-Andújar,et al.  Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat , 2010 .

[2]  G. Clayton,et al.  Wild Oat (Avena Fatua) vs. Redstem Filaree (Erodium Cicutarium) Interference in Dry Pea , 2007, Weed Technology.

[3]  P. Brain,et al.  Predicting the competitive effects of weed and crop density on weed biomass, weed seed production and crop yield in wheat. , 2006 .

[4]  E. Marshall,et al.  Modelling interactions between herbicide dose and multiple weed species interference in crop–weed competition , 2006 .

[5]  R. Ashley,et al.  Interference of large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), and hairy galinsoga (Galinsoga ciliata) with bell pepper , 2006, Weed Science.

[6]  W. Deen,et al.  Weed Control in Pea with Reduced Rates of Imazethapyr Applied Preemergence and Postemergence1 , 2005, Weed Technology.

[7]  J. Lindquist,et al.  Influence of soybean row width and velvetleaf emergence time on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) , 2005, Weed Science.

[8]  E. Marshall,et al.  Modelling herbicide dose and weed density effects on crop:weed competition , 2002 .

[9]  B. Young,et al.  Influence of Weed Competition and Herbicides on Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[10]  J. Boyer,et al.  Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn , 2001, Weed Science.

[11]  D. Faccini,et al.  Control of Amaranthus quitensis in soybean crops in Argentina: an alternative to reduce herbicide use. , 2000 .

[12]  Carlo Leifert,et al.  Effects of environmental factors on germination and emergence of Amaranthus retroflexus , 1999, Weed Science.

[13]  C. Swanton,et al.  Interference between pigweed (Amaranthus spp.), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and soybean (Glycine max) , 1998, Weed Science.

[14]  J. J. Kells,et al.  Effect of Soil-Applied Atrazine and Pendimethalin on Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Competitiveness in Corn , 1998, Weed Technology.

[15]  D. L. Colvin,et al.  Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference with peanut (Arachis hypogaea) , 1997, Weed Science.

[16]  J. Toler,et al.  Interference Between Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus), and Soybean (Glycine max) , 1996, Weed Science.

[17]  A. Dieleman,et al.  Empirical Models of Pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) Interference in Soybean (Glycine max) , 1995, Weed Science.

[18]  C. Swanton,et al.  Influence of Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) Time of Emergence and Density on White Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) , 1995, Weed Science.

[19]  L. R. Oliver,et al.  Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and Entireleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea van integriuscula) Interference on Soybeans (Glycine max) , 1995, Weed Science.

[20]  L. R. Oliver,et al.  Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Interference in Soybeans (Glycine max) , 1994, Weed Science.

[21]  S. Weaver Size-Dependent Economic Thresholds for Three Broadleaf Weed Species in Soybeans , 1991, Weed Technology.

[22]  H. Coble,et al.  Interference of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 1991, Weed Technology.

[23]  P. A. Banks,et al.  Effects of Preemergence Herbicides on the Competitiveness of Selected Weeds , 1991, Weed Science.

[24]  R. Cousens A simple model relating yield loss to weed density , 1985 .

[25]  J. Specht,et al.  Competition and Allelopathy Between Soybeans and Weeds1 , 1984 .

[26]  L. Wax,et al.  Competition of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with Soybean (Glycine max) , 1982, Weed Science.