Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model.

In multilevel modeling, one often distinguishes between macro-micro and micro-macro situations. In a macro-micro multilevel situation, a dependent variable measured at the lower level is predicted or explained by variables measured at that lower or a higher level. In a micro-macro multilevel situation, a dependent variable defined at the higher group level is predicted or explained on the basis of independent variables measured at the lower individual level. Up until now, multilevel methodology has mainly focused on macro-micro multilevel situations. In this article, a latent variable model is proposed for analyzing data from micro-macro situations. It is shown that regression analyses carried out at the aggregated level result in biased parameter estimates. A method that uses the best linear unbiased predictors of the group means is shown to yield unbiased estimates of the parameters.

[1]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The Human Resource ‒ Firm Performance Relationship: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges , 2008 .

[2]  D. Hofmann.  Issues in Multilevel Research: Theory Development, Measurement, and Analysis , 2008 .

[3]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[4]  M. Bond,et al.  Linking Societal and Psychological Factors to Homicide Rates Across Nations , 2005 .

[5]  Michael C Neale,et al.  People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[6]  J. Dawson,et al.  Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation , 2005 .

[7]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  P. Warr,et al.  Organizational climate and company productivity: The role of employee affect and employee level , 2004 .

[9]  Arla Day,et al.  Using an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence to predict individual performance, group performance, and group citizenship behaviours , 2004 .

[10]  Timothy J. Loving,et al.  Time pressure and group performance: Exploring underlying processes in the Attentional Focus Model , 2004 .

[11]  I. Fulmer,et al.  ARE THE 100 BEST BETTER? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BEING A “GREAT PLACE TO WORK” AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[12]  Patrick J Curran,et al.  Have Multilevel Models Been Structural Equation Models All Along? , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[13]  B. Schneider,et al.  Which comes first: employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Mel Schnake,et al.  Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organizational citizenship behaviour research , 2003 .

[15]  Daniel J. Bauer.  Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation Models , 2003 .

[16]  Garry A. Gelade,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management and Work Climate on Organizational Performance , 2003 .

[17]  Christopher P. Parker,et al.  Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review , 2003 .

[18]  Michael Rutter,et al.  School Effectiveness Findings 1979–2002 , 2002 .

[19]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  The Effect Of Individual Perceptions of Deadlines on Team Performance , 2001 .

[20]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[21]  Van de Vijver,et al.  Methodological Issues in Psychological Research on Culture , 2000 .

[22]  Ronald H. Heck,et al.  An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques , 1999 .

[23]  Mark A. Griffin,et al.  Interaction Between Individuals and Situations: Using HLM Procedures to Estimate Reciprocal Relationships , 1997 .

[24]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[25]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  The Estimation of School Effects , 1995 .

[26]  Paul E. Spector.  Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Research and Practice , 1995 .

[27]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[28]  B. Muthén,et al.  Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis , 1994 .

[29]  Cheri Ostroff.  The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. , 1992 .

[30]  J M Neuhaus,et al.  Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses , 1992, Statistical methods in medical research.

[31]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[32]  A. Donner.  A Review of Inference Procedures for the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in the One-Way Random Effects Model , 1986 .

[33]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[34]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[35]  V. Glăveanu,et al.  Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology , 2004 .

[36]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  David Holman,et al.  The essentials of the new workplace : a guide to the human impact of modern working practices , 2002 .

[38]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions. , 2000 .

[39]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[40]  D. Norton,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[41]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Aggregation and disaggregation in sociology , 1970 .