The NMR solution structure of a mutant of the Max b/HLH/LZ free of DNA: insights into the specific and reversible DNA binding mechanism of dimeric transcription factors.

Basic region-helix1-loop-helix2-leucine zipper (b/H(1)LH(2)/LZ) transcription factors bind specific DNA sequence in their target gene promoters as dimers. Max, a b/H(1)LH(2)/LZ transcription factor, is the obligate heterodimeric partner of the related b/H(1)LH(2)/LZ proteins of the Myc and Mad families. These heterodimers specifically bind E-box DNA sequence (CACGTG) to activate (e.g. c-Myc/Max) and repress (e.g. Mad1/Max) transcription. Max can also homodimerize and bind E-box sequences in c-Myc target gene promoters. While the X-ray structure of the Max b/H(1)LH(2)/LZ/DNA complex and that of others have been reported, the precise sequence of events leading to the reversible and specific binding of these important transcription factors is still largely unknown. In order to provide insights into the DNA binding mechanism, we have solved the NMR solution structure of a covalently homodimerized version of a Max b/H(1)LH(2)/LZ protein with two stabilizing mutations in the LZ, and characterized its backbone dynamics from (15)N spin-relaxation measurements in the absence of DNA. Apart from minor differences in the pitch of the LZ, possibly resulting from the mutations in the construct, we observe that the packing of the helices in the H(1)LH(2) domain is almost identical to that of the two crystal structures, indicating that no important conformational change in these helices occurs upon DNA binding. Conversely to the crystal structures of the DNA complexes, the first 14 residues of the basic region are found to be mostly unfolded while the loop is observed to be flexible. This indicates that these domains undergo conformational changes upon DNA binding. On the other hand, we find the last four residues of the basic region form a persistent helical turn contiguous to H(1). In addition, we provide evidence of the existence of internal motions in the backbone of H(1) that are of larger amplitude and longer time-scale (nanoseconds) than the ones in the H(2) and LZ domain. Most interestingly, we note that conformers in the ensemble of calculated structures have highly conserved basic residues (located in the persistent helical turn of the basic region and in the loop) known to be important for specific binding in a conformation that matches that of the DNA-bound state. These partially prefolded conformers can directly fit into the major groove of DNA and as such are proposed to lie on the pathway leading to the reversible and specific DNA binding. In these conformers, the conserved basic side-chains form a cluster that elevates the local electrostatic potential and could provide the necessary driving force for the generation of the internal motions localized in the H(1) and therefore link structural determinants with the DNA binding function. Overall, our results suggests that the Max homodimeric b/H(1)LH(2)/LZ can rapidly and preferentially bind DNA sequence through transient and partially prefolded states and subsequently, adopt the fully helical bound state in a DNA-assisted mechanism or induced-fit.

[1]  K. Wüthrich NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[2]  Y. Kyōgoku,et al.  Crystal structure of PHO4 bHLH domain–DNA complex: flanking base recognition , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[3]  Ad Bax,et al.  Correlating Backbone Amide and Side-Chain Resonances in Larger Proteins By Multiple Relayed Triple Resonance NMR , 1992 .

[4]  A. Palmer,et al.  Nmr probes of molecular dynamics: overview and comparison with other techniques. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[5]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity , 1982 .

[6]  M. Nilges,et al.  Calculation of symmetric multimer structures from NMR data using a priori knowledge of the monomer structure, co-monomer restraints, and interface mapping: The case of leucine zippers , 1996, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[7]  A. Bax,et al.  Anisotropic rotational diffusion of perdeuterated HIV protease from 15N NMR relaxation measurements at two magnetic fields , 1996, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[8]  L. Nicholson,et al.  An improved method for distinguishing between anisotropic tumbling and chemical exchange in analysis of 15N relaxation parameters , 2001, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[9]  P. Sharp,et al.  High affinity DNA-binding Myc analogs: Recognition by an α helix , 1993, Cell.

[10]  Bruce A. Johnson,et al.  NMR View: A computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[11]  A. Bax,et al.  Rotational diffusion anisotropy of human ubiquitin from 15N NMR relaxation , 1995 .

[12]  S. Harrison,et al.  Crystal structure of transcription factor E47: E-box recognition by a basic region helix-loop-helix dimer. , 1994, Genes & development.

[13]  M. Eilers,et al.  Transcriptional repression by Myc. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[14]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , 1992 .

[15]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  X-Ray Structures of Myc-Max and Mad-Max Recognizing DNA Molecular Bases of Regulation by Proto-Oncogenic Transcription Factors , 2003, Cell.

[16]  L. Kay,et al.  Gradient-Enhanced Triple-Resonance Three-Dimensional NMR Experiments with Improved Sensitivity , 1994 .

[17]  T. Ceska,et al.  The crystal structure of an intact human Max-DNA complex: new insights into mechanisms of transcriptional control. , 1997, Structure.

[18]  R. Allemann,et al.  Thermodynamics of DNA binding of MM17, a 'single chain dimer' of transcription factor MASH-1. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  L. Penn,et al.  The myc oncogene: MarvelouslY Complex. , 2002, Advances in cancer research.

[20]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[21]  L. Kay,et al.  Flexibility and ligand exchange in a buried cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme studied by multinuclear NMR. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[22]  Eric Oldfield,et al.  1H, 13C and 15N chemical shift referencing in biomolecular NMR , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[23]  T. Ellenberger Getting a grip on DNA recognition: structures of the basic region leucine zipper, and the basic region helix-loop-helix DNA-binding domains , 1994 .

[24]  B. Lüscher,et al.  Function and regulation of the transcription factors of the Myc/Max/Mad network. , 2001, Gene.

[25]  A. Schepartz,et al.  DNA specificity enhanced by sequential binding of protein monomers. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Steven L. Cohen,et al.  Probing the solution structure of the DNA‐binding protein Max by a combination of proteolysis and mass spectrometry , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  R. Hodges,et al.  Insights into the mechanism of heterodimerization from the 1H-NMR solution structure of the c-Myc-Max heterodimeric leucine zipper. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  T. Pawson,et al.  Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[29]  R. Eisenman,et al.  The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. , 2000, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[30]  Yawen Bai,et al.  [15] Thermodynamic parameters from hydrogen exchange measurements , 1995 .

[31]  F. Crick,et al.  The packing of α‐helices: simple coiled‐coils , 1953 .

[32]  R. Eisenman,et al.  Mad: A heterodimeric partner for Max that antagonizes Myc transcriptional activity , 1993, Cell.

[33]  D. Case,et al.  Use of chemical shifts in macromolecular structure determination. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[34]  Jeffrey W. Peng,et al.  [20] Investigation of protein motions via relaxation measurements , 1994 .

[35]  S. Burley DNA-binding motifs from eukaryotic transcription factors , 1994 .

[36]  P. Sharp,et al.  Myc/Max and other helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper proteins bend DNA toward the minor groove. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  A T Brünger,et al.  Relaxation matrix refinement of the solution structure of squash trypsin inhibitor. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  L. Kay Field gradient techniques in NMR spectroscopy. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[39]  S. Phillips Built by association: structure and function of helix-loop-helix DNA-binding proteins. , 1994, Structure.

[40]  H. Roder,et al.  Rapid amide proton exchange rates in peptides and proteins measured by solvent quenching and two‐dimensional NMR , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  Littlewood Td,et al.  Transcription factors 2: helix-loop-helix. , 1995, Protein profile.

[42]  G. Lipari Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules , 1982 .

[43]  B. Kräutler,et al.  Structure, function, and dynamics of the dimerization and DNA-binding domain of oncogenic transcription factor v-Myc. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  N. Tjandra,et al.  The Use of Residual Dipolar Coupling in Concert with Backbone Relaxation Rates to Identify Conformational Exchange by NMR , 1999 .

[45]  M Nilges,et al.  A calculation strategy for the structure determination of symmetric demers by 1H NMR , 1993, Proteins.

[46]  T. Ellenberger,et al.  DNA-mediated Folding and Assembly of MyoD-E47 Heterodimers* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Eric Oldfield,et al.  Chemical shifts and three-dimensional protein structures , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[48]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[49]  A. Palmer,et al.  Temperature dependence of intramolecular dynamics of the basic leucine zipper of GCN4: implications for the entropy of association with DNA. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  A. Ferré-D’Amaré,et al.  Structure and function of the b/HLH/Z domain of USF , 1994 .

[51]  Gianni Cesareni,et al.  Molecular Recognition in Helix-Loop-Helix and Helix-Loop-Helix-Leucine Zipper Domains , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  Pierre Lavigne,et al.  Improving the thermodynamic stability of the leucine zipper of max increases the stability of its b-HLH-LZ:E-box complex. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  L. Kay,et al.  A novel approach for sequential assignment of proton, carbon-13, and nitrogen-15 spectra of larger proteins: heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Application to calmodulin , 1990 .

[54]  L. Kay,et al.  A novel approach for sequential assignment of 1H, 13C, and 15N spectra of proteins: heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Application to calmodulin. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[55]  Carl O. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of MyoD bHLH domain-DNA complex: Perspectives on DNA recognition and implications for transcriptional activation , 1994, Cell.

[56]  R. Fairman,et al.  Heteronuclear (1H, 13C, 15N) NMR assignments and secondary structure of the basic region‐helix‐loop‐helix domain of E47 , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[57]  A. Jasanoff,et al.  Characterizing protein-protein complexes and oligomers by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[58]  J. Hus,et al.  Efficient analysis of macromolecular rotational diffusion from heteronuclear relaxation data , 2000, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[59]  C D Kroenke,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for quantifying microsecond-to-millisecond motions in biological macromolecules. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[60]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  Recognition by Max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain , 1993, Nature.

[61]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Calculation of Symmetric Oligomer Structures from NMR Data , 2002 .

[62]  L. Kay,et al.  Enhanced-Sensitivity Triple-Resonance Spectroscopy with Minimal H2O Saturation , 1994 .

[63]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  A 3D triple-resonance NMR technique for qualitative measurement of carbonyl-Hβ J couplings in isotopically enriched proteins , 1992 .

[64]  Factors determining the reliable description of global tumbling parameters in solution NMR , 2002, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[65]  M Nilges,et al.  High Resolution NMR Solution Structure of the Leucine Zipper Domain of the c-Jun Homodimer* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  P. S. Kim,et al.  X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil. , 1991, Science.

[67]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 2. Analysis of experimental results , 1982 .

[68]  R. Eisenman,et al.  Mad-max transcriptional repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3 , 1995, Cell.

[69]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by dynamical simulated annealing from a random array of atoms Circumventing problems associated with folding , 1988, FEBS letters.

[70]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Determining the structures of large proteins and protein complexes by NMR. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[71]  L. Kay,et al.  Backbone and methyl dynamics of the regulatory domain of troponin C: anisotropic rotational diffusion and contribution of conformational entropy to calcium affinity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  D. Wemmer,et al.  Backbone dynamics of sequence specific recognition and binding by the yeast Pho4 bHLH domain probed by NMR , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[73]  Yawen Bai,et al.  Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange , 1993, Biochemistry.

[74]  Ad Bax,et al.  Multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance methods for protein studies , 1994 .

[75]  C. Berger,et al.  Diffusion‐controlled DNA recognition by an unfolded, monomeric bZIP transcription factor , 1998, FEBS letters.

[76]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.