USER-RELATED COMPLEXITY DIMENSIONS OF COMPLEX PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS (CoPS): A CASE OF IMPLEMENTING AN ERP SYSTEM

What can cause five postponements and a delay of two years in introducing a relatively simple ERP system that usually takes only a few months to be implemented? We find the answer to this puzzle by highlighting the context of use of this high technology IT capital good, an issue so far overlooked because the literature on complex product system (CoPS) focuses on the intrinsic dimensions of the product and the provider. We rely on an extensive case study of the ERP system Movex at the furniture manufacturer Edsbyn and on literature on user-related innovations, organisational studies and inter-firm relationships to extract a series of additional user-related complexity dimensions. These include the importance of the capital good for the user, the user's perception of its complexity and the strength and complexity of the routines to be changed at the using organisation. We conclude the paper with implications for complex systems providers.

[1]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[2]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[3]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[4]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[5]  M. Hobday The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[7]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Constructing social research :the unity and diversity of method , 1996 .

[8]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the capital goods economy: complex product systems in the UK , 2004 .

[9]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Projects as Arenas for Renewal and Learning Processes , 1998 .

[10]  C. R. Venugopal,et al.  Single goal set: a new paradigm for IT megaproject success , 2005, IEEE Software.

[11]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Supplier Selection in an International Environment—An Experimental Study , 1975 .

[12]  Roger G. Dear,et al.  Managing Uncertainty in Multilevel Manufacturing Systems , 1991 .

[13]  Allen Kent,et al.  Encyclopedia of Microcomputers , 1987 .

[14]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  C. A. Voss,et al.  Implementation: A key issue in manufacturing technology: The need for a field of study , 1988 .

[17]  A. Davies,et al.  Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions , 2000 .

[18]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[19]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[20]  A. Davies,et al.  Systems Integration: a Core Capability of the Modern Corporation , 2022 .

[21]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[22]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Technology management in complex product systems (CoPS) - ten questions answered , 1999 .

[23]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[24]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Organizational Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A Conceptual Framework , 2007 .

[25]  J. Johanson,et al.  Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach , 1987 .

[26]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[27]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[28]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[29]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Business Network Learning , 2001 .

[30]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box: Learning by using , 1983 .

[31]  H. Håkansson International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .

[32]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[33]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[34]  Stephen Flowers,et al.  CONTINGENT CAPABILITIES AND THE PROCUREMENT OF COMPLEX PRODUCT SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[35]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[36]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[37]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Influence tactics in buyer — seller processes , 1976 .

[38]  Shoshana Zuboff In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[39]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Customer-Centric Organization: A Guide to Strategy, Structure, and Process , 2005 .

[40]  Arndt Sorge,et al.  The IEBM Handbook of Organizational Behaviour , 2000 .

[41]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  A methodology for ERP misfit analysis , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[42]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[43]  Piotr Soja,et al.  Examining the conditions of ERP implementations: lessons learnt from adopters , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[44]  Jens Laage-Hellman,et al.  Information Technology and the Efficiency of Materials Supply - The implementation of EDI in Swedish construction industry , 1996 .

[45]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[46]  John Bessant,et al.  Innovation and Organizational Learning: the Case of Computer‐Aided Production Management , 1993 .