CLMI: The Cone Location and Magnitude Index

Purpose: To develop an index for the detection of keratoconic patterns in corneal topography maps from multiple devices. Methods: For development, an existing Keratron (EyeQuip) topographic dataset, consisting of 78 scans from the right eyes of 78 healthy subjects and 25 scans from the right eyes of 25 subjects with clinically diagnosed keratoconus, was retrospectively analyzed. The Cone Location and Magnitude Index (CLMI) was calculated on the available axial and tangential curvature data. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the best predictor(s) for the detection of keratoconus. A sensitivity and specificity analysis was performed by using the best predictor of keratoconus. Percent probability of keratoconus was defined as the optimal probability threshold for the detection of disease. For validation, CLMI was calculated retrospectively on a second distinct dataset, acquired on a different topographer, the TMS-1. The validation dataset consisted of 2 scans from 24 eyes of 12 healthy subjects with no ocular history and 4 scans from 21 eyes of 14 subjects with clinically diagnosed keratoconus. Probability of keratoconus was calculated for the validation set from the equation determined from the development dataset. Results: The strongest significant sole predictor in the stepwise logistic regression was aCLMI, which is CLMI calculated from axial data. Sensitivity and specificity for aCLMI on the development dataset were 92% and 100%, respectively. A complete separation of normals and keratoconics with 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity was achieved by using the validation set. Conclusions: CLMI provides a robust index that can detect the presence or absence of a keratoconic pattern in corneal topography maps from 2 devices.

[1]  Y. Rabinowitz Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. , 1995, Journal of refractive surgery.

[2]  Michael D Twa,et al.  Characteristics of Corneal Ectasia After LASIK for Myopia , 2004, Cornea.

[3]  K. Schechtman,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Corneal Curvature in Keratoconus , 2006, Cornea.

[4]  S. Klyce Information fidelity in corneal topography. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  K. Zadnik,et al.  The relation between disease asymmetry and severity in keratoconus , 2003, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Klyce,et al.  Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  N Maeda,et al.  Neural network classification of corneal topography. Preliminary demonstration. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Y. Rabinowitz,et al.  KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  Decision Tree Classification of Spatial Data Patterns from Videokeratography using Zernicke Polynomials , 2003, SDM.

[10]  Y. Rabinowitz,et al.  Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. , 1989, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[11]  S D Klyce,et al.  Screening of prior refractive surgery by a wavelet‐based neural network , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  S D Klyce,et al.  Screening for corneal topographic abnormalities before refractive surgery. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Dingeldein,et al.  Corneal Topography of Early Keratoconus , 1989 .

[14]  N Maeda,et al.  Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  J. Krachmer,et al.  Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. , 1984, Survey of ophthalmology.

[16]  Naoyuki Maeda,et al.  Neural Network Classification of Corneal Topography , 1995 .

[17]  Cynthia Roberts,et al.  Simulation of Machine-Specific Topographic Indices for Use Across Platforms , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  K. Maruo,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of irregular astigmatism by fourier series harmonic analysis of videokeratography data. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  K. Lebow,et al.  Differentiating contact lens induced warpage from true keratoconus using corneal topography. , 1999, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[20]  S. Parthasarathy,et al.  Automated Decision Tree Classification of Corneal Shape , 2005, Optometry and Vision Science.