VillageFinder: Segmentation of Nucleated Villages in Satellite Imagery

Geo-spatial data on village locations, their size, population and other parameters is scarcely available to decision makers in many developing countries. In this paper, we demonstrate an automatic ?crawler? which can segment nucleated villages from satellite imagery freely available in public domain geographic information systems such as Google EarthTM. Our approach is to use frequency and color features to generate a number of weak classifiers, which are then combined through Adaboost to produce the final classifier. We use a total of 69 features in the generation of the weak classifiers, including phase gradients, cornerness measures and color features. Our primary dataset consists of 60 images having more than 345 million pixels and covering more than 100 km2 of area, containing nucleated villages in fifteen countries, spread over four continents and captured by different sensors. Using six manual annotations for ground-truth, we perform five-fold cross validation, using 25% of data for testing. Our results show an Equal Error Rate (EER) of around 3.4%. Using the trained classifier, we detect villages on a 50 km2 image (close to 184 million pixels) from a different site than the images used in training, and demonstrate highly accurate extraction of villages with 2.3% false positives and 0.01% false negatives.

[1]  Yong Zhang,et al.  A segmentation and classification approach of land cover mapping using Quick Bird image , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[2]  Peter Kovesi,et al.  Image Features from Phase Congruency , 1995 .

[3]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  The analytic image , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Ren C. Luo,et al.  Multisensor fusion and integration: approaches, applications, and future research directions , 2002 .

[6]  P. Hardin Parametric and nearest-neighbor methods for hybrid classification: a comparison of pixel assignment accuracy , 1994 .

[7]  D. Waugh Geography: An Integrated Approach , 1990 .

[8]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance , 2007 .

[10]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[11]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Object localization using color, texture and shape , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  C. V. D. Sande,et al.  A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment , 2003 .

[14]  Bartlett W. Mel SEEMORE: Combining Color, Shape, and Texture Histogramming in a Neurally Inspired Approach to Visual Object Recognition , 1997, Neural Computation.

[15]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Filtering and reconstruction in image processing , 1984 .

[16]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.