Intracranial Pressure Response to Non-Penetrating Ballistic Impact: An Experimental Study Using a Pig Physical Head Model and Live Pigs

This study was conducted to characterize the intracranial pressure response to non-penetrating ballistic impact using a "scalp-skull-brain" pig physical head model and live pigs. Forty-eight ballistic tests targeting the physical head model and anesthetized pigs protected by aramid plates were conducted with standard 9 mm bullets at low (279-297 m/s), moderate (350-372 m/s), and high (409-436 m/s) velocities. Intracranial pressure responses were recorded with pressure sensors embedded in similar brain locations in the physical head model and the anesthetized pigs. Three parameters of intracranial pressure were determined from the measured data: intracranial maximum pressure (Pmax), intracranial maximum pressure impulse (PImax), and the duration of the first positive phase (PPD). The intracranial pressure waves exhibited blast-like characteristics for both the physical model and l live pigs. Of all three parameters, Pmax is most sensitive to impact velocity, with means of 126 kPa (219 kPa), 178 kPa (474 kPa), and 241 kPa (751 kPa) for the physical model (live pigs) for low, moderate, and high impact velocities, respectively. The mean PPD becomes increasingly short as the impact velocity increases, whereas PImax shows the opposite trend. Although the pressure parameters of the physical model were much lower than those of the live pigs, good correlations between the physical model and the live pigs for the three pressure parameters, especially Pmax, were found using linear regression. This investigation suggests that Pmax is a preferred parameter for predicting the severity of the brain injury resulting from behind armor blunt trauma (BABT).

[1]  L Cannon,et al.  Behind Armour Blunt Trauma - an emerging problem , 2001, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps.

[2]  Alexis Faure,et al.  Dynamic effects of a 9 mm missile on cadaveric skull protected by aramid, polyethylene or aluminum plate: an experimental study. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  M. Carey,et al.  Analysis of wounds incurred by U.S. Army Seventh Corps personnel treated in Corps hospitals during Operation Desert Storm, February 20 to March 10, 1991. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  Garrett W. Wood,et al.  Brain Injuries from Blast , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  N. Prat,et al.  Intrathoracic pressure impulse predicts pulmonary contusion volume in ballistic blunt thoracic trauma. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  J. Sarron,et al.  Consequences of nonpenetrating projectile impact on a protected head: study of rear effects of protections. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Rocco Armonda,et al.  An introductory characterization of a combat-casualty-care relevant swine model of closed head injury resulting from exposure to explosive blast. , 2009, Journal of neurotrauma.

[8]  M. Ziejewski,et al.  Biomechanical Assessment of Brain Dynamic Responses Due to Blast Pressure Waves , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Cameron R Bass,et al.  Injury Risk in Behind Armor Blunt Thoracic Trauma , 2006, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[10]  E. E. Ward,et al.  Computational and experimental models of the human torso for non-penetrating ballistic impact. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Dmitry V. Balandin,et al.  Capabilities of helmets for preventing head injuries induced by ballistic impacts , 2004 .

[12]  Rocco Armonda,et al.  An introductory characterization of a combat-casualty-care relevant swine model of closed head injury resulting from exposure to explosive blast. , 2009, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  H P Lee,et al.  Finite element analysis for the evaluation of protective functions of helmets against ballistic impact , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[14]  J. Forman,et al.  Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research , 2011, Clinical anatomy.