Narrowing the set of complex systems’ possible design solutions derived from the set-based concurrent engineering approach

Nowadays, complex systems are dominating our contemporary as well as professional lives. These modern technical products are considered as mechatronic systems which incorporate mechanics with electronics, software, and control in various domains mainly transport, medicine, and robotics. The development of these modern technical products is thus so tough. Hence, mechatronics’ critical challenges are to be not only well understood but also supported by practical models and tools in order to overcome this difficulty. Moreover, using the traditional design method which is point based is inefficient as it leads to a huge decrease in the innovation potential through limiting the design space to few solutions, an important increase in the cost of the product as well as production delay due to the great number of iterations. Some product development practices have shifted from using the “fixed-point design” approach to the “set-based design” one. Indeed, the set-based concurrent engineering widely considers a set of possible solutions and then shrinks the number of possibilities in order to converge toward a final solution. Yet, since this approach is too difficult to be put into action, a small number of industries in the field of mechatronics use the set-based concurrent engineering concept. Accordingly, this work aims to develop a novel method for the purpose of facilitating the development of a complex product based on the set-based concurrent engineering method and its implementation in an industrial setting by developing an algorithm to find the set of possible solutions to the design problem and narrow this set to merge toward the final solution. Finally, this algorithm is implemented using “Python” language.

[1]  Yan Li,et al.  A method of implementing formalized multidisciplinary collaboration in product conceptual design process , 2017 .

[2]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[3]  Alain Bernard,et al.  RFBS: A model for knowledge representation of conceptual design , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[5]  Brian Prasad,et al.  A KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS FOR OBTAINING ENGINEERING DESIGN SOLUTIONS , 2005 .

[6]  Moncef Hammadi,et al.  Mechatronic system design with manufacturing constraints using set-based concurrent engineering , 2018, 2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon).

[7]  Wonmo Kim A framework for set-based manufacturing analysis and visual feedback , 2015 .

[8]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[9]  Brian Prasad An Iterative Decision-Based Technique for Finding Topologically-Feasible Solution Sets Quickly , 2009 .

[10]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Reducing Rework by Applying Set‐Based Practices Early in the Systems Engineering Process , 2014, Syst. Eng..

[11]  Alberto Rosso,et al.  Set-Based Concurrent Engineering Innovation Roadmap (SBCE IR): a case on Adiabatic Humidification System , 2014 .

[12]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices , 2007 .

[13]  Tyson R. Browning Process integration using the design structure matrix , 2002 .

[14]  Ali Yassine,et al.  Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[15]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Biren Prasad System Integration Techniques of Sharing and Collaboration among Work-groups, Computers and Processes , 1999, J. Syst. Integr..

[17]  N. Kyura,et al.  Mechatronics-an industrial perspective , 1996 .

[18]  Mikel Sorli,et al.  The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: A case study from an aerospace industry , 2013, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[19]  Jianxun Liu,et al.  A Constraint-driven Execution Plan for Maximizing Concurrency in Product Development , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[20]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[21]  Lawrence D. Pohlmann,et al.  The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods , 2000 .

[22]  Hans‐Peter Hoffmann,et al.  5.3.3 SysML‐Based Systems Engineering Using a Model‐Driven Development Approach , 2006 .

[23]  Mark H Lowenberg,et al.  50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference , 2009 .

[24]  Sarah A. Sheard,et al.  2.5.1 Systems Engineering Standards and Models Compared , 1998 .

[25]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[26]  Mohamed Haddar,et al.  Architectural design of complex systems using set-based concurrent engineering , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE).

[27]  Anja Schulze,et al.  Developing products with set-based design: How to set up an idea portfolio and a team organization to establish design feasibility , 2016, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[28]  Umberto Montanaro,et al.  Robust Discrete-Time MRAC With Minimal Controller Synthesis of an Electronic Throttle Body , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[29]  Dag Raudberget,et al.  Practical Applications of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering in Industry , 2010 .