Are Online Social Networks, Leading to a 'Better World in the Omani Public Sector? A Qualitative Study

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) penetration is growing at exponential rates and affecting societies, countries and organizations, which has led to a need for understanding whether they contribute to development. To ascertain whether ICT are contributing to development, the example of a current ICT, Twitter is used, along with the aim of this research: To understand and explain how public sector organizations are adopting and using online social networks; namely twitter, for the delivery of e-government services that will provide a better world to live in the Omani public sector. By considering this aim, we attempt to explain whether Twitter, contributes towards the creation of a ‘better world’ to live in, or leads to diverse outcomes in a developing country, Oman. To achieve the aim, we used two public sector organizations workforces’ experiences and applied the Choice Framework (CF) developed by Kleine [1]. For the research approach, we employed a qualitative approach and the data collection techniques, reference to archival documents, interviews, photographic evidence and observations. The analysis was completed using the lens of interpretivism, socio-materiality along with grounded theory concepts. The study reveals that ICT4D is providing a better world for most of the citizens, but for the providers of the improved e-government services, it implies aligning local practices to the technology, which affects their home/work life balance. The contributions of this research lie in emphasising largely how the use of Twitter in Oman will lead to development. The Choice Framework selected for our understanding was adapted and led to diverse results to those mentioned in previous ICT4D studies; therefore, our research makes a contribution of understanding ICT4D in an e-government context, which was amiss in the previous frameworks. For businesses, our findings inform practitioners on the ICT Technologies areas that need attention while implementing them within an environment similar to Oman’s public sector. For policymakers, this research informs of the areas that require policymakers’ attention when placing their efforts where they are best served.

[1]  Tae Ho Eom,et al.  Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital , 2009 .

[2]  SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS GUIDANCE SHEETS INTRODUCTION ORIGINS AND OBJECTIVES 1 . 2 , 1999 .

[3]  G. Walsham,et al.  Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects , 2006 .

[4]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[5]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Resources, Values and Development. , 1985 .

[6]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Understanding individual user resistance and workarounds of enterprise social networks: the case of Service Ltd , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Anthony D. Williams,et al.  Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World , 2010 .

[8]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[9]  R. Alsop,et al.  Measuring Empowerment in Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framing Indicators , 2005 .

[10]  Amartya Sen Resources, Values, and Development , 1985 .

[11]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[12]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[14]  Richard Heeks Understanding e-Governance for Development , 2001 .

[15]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[16]  Moaman Al-Busaidy,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING E-GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS IN OMAN: A DISCUSSION , 2008 .

[17]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  Accessibility : In-Depth Evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman , 2005 .

[18]  Rafi Ashrafi,et al.  Use and Impact of ICT on SMEs in Oman , 2008 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Michael J. Magro A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government , 2012 .

[21]  A. Sen,et al.  Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What's Wrong with Welfare Economics? , 1979 .

[22]  D. Kleine ICT4WHAT?—Using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development , 2010 .

[23]  W. Elmendorf,et al.  Using Key Informant Interviews to Better Understand Open Space Conservation in a Developing Watershed , 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[24]  M. Castells Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society , 2000 .

[26]  Richard Heeks,et al.  ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development , 2008, Computer.

[27]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Mathias Bös Globalization - Social Theory and Global Culture , 1994 .

[29]  J. James ICT4D: Information and Communication Technology for Development , 2010 .