National Context and Spouses’ Housework in 34 Countries

By focusing on how national context and individual factors affect spouses’ absolute and relative contributions, social scientists are better able to understand couples’ organising and sharing of housework. Previous studies have suggested a linkage between female empowerment and the division of housework; however, documented effects have proven inconsistent. The authors propose that a less pronounced cross-national pattern for relative efforts reflects the fact that national context affect wives’ and husbands’ total involvement in the same direction. A reinterpretation of the ‘discount’ hypothesis is also suggested, relating interaction effects for relative efforts to non-interaction for spouses’ total contributions. Moreover, extending the causal model to include economic development as a macro-level explanatory variable permits a nuanced account of how different aspects of national context affect wives’ and husbands’ housework decisions. Within this extended framework the initially weak female empowerment - relative division linkage appears stronger. Based on a multilevel analysis of recently released data from 34 countries in the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), this article, on a wider basis than hitherto possible, jointly analyses spouses’ absolute and relative contributions, and investigates the interplay between macro-level forces and individual-level factors in influencing couples’ domestic labour.

[1]  J. Brines The Exchange Value of Housework , 1993 .

[2]  Kari Wærness The Invisible Welfare State: Women's Work at Home , 1978 .

[3]  Jennifer L. Hook Care in Context: Men's Unpaid Work in 20 Countries, 1965–2003 , 2006 .

[4]  F. Rosenbluth,et al.  The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross‐National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap , 2006 .

[5]  Bernhard Kittel A Crazy Methodology? , 2006 .

[6]  O. Sullivan,et al.  Time Use, Gender, and Public Policy Regimes , 2003 .

[7]  Gerhard G. van de Bunt,et al.  Comparative Research , 2006 .

[8]  M. Kan Measuring Housework Participation: The Gap between “Stylised” Questionnaire Estimates and Diary-based Estimates , 2008 .

[9]  Makiko Fuwa,et al.  Macro-level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries , 2004 .

[10]  Y. Kamo “He Said, She Said”: Assessing Discrepancies in Husbands' and Wives' Reports on the Division of Household Labor , 2000 .

[11]  Philip N. Cohen,et al.  Premarital Cohabitation and Housework: Couples in Cross‐National Perspective , 2002 .

[12]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Work in the Family and in the Labor Market: A Cross-national, Reciprocal Analysis , 1990 .

[13]  S. Lingsom,et al.  Increasing equality in household work: patterns of time-use change in Norway , 1986 .

[14]  J. Baxter,et al.  Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective , 1997 .

[15]  Carrie L. Yodanis Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality , 2005 .

[16]  C. Geist The Welfare State and the Home: Regime Differences in the Domestic Division of Labour , 2005 .

[17]  Scott Coltrane,et al.  Research on household labor : Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work , 2000 .

[18]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor , 2000 .

[19]  T. Lyngstad,et al.  Diary versus questionnaire information on time spent on housework – The case of Norway , 2005 .

[20]  Hanny Cueva Beteta What is missing in measures of Women's Empowerment? , 2006 .

[21]  R. Blumberg A General Theory of Gender Stratification , 1984 .