The influence of ship operational profile in the sustainability of ship energy systems

In recent years, the environmental and economic sustainability of the shipping sector has gained great atten-tion due to the imposed environmental legislation and the uncertainty on fuel prices. The extant literature re-view acknowledges the importance of the operational profile in the improvement of ship systems energy effi-ciency. However, there has not been a complete study to identify and measure the impact of the operational profile on the environmental and economic performance of ship energy systems. In this paper, the influence of the ship operational profile on the sustainability performance of the main ship energy systems is investigated. Different operational profiles are implemented and the resulting economic and environmental impact of the main engine, the thermal boilers and the auxiliary engines of an Aframax tanker ship are analysed over the ship’s operational life cycle. Varying the speed distribution affects both the transportation time for a specific voyage as well as the number of voyages per year. Considering these parameters a complete estimation of the emissions emitted, the fuel consumption, the operational costs and the profits from the cargo transportation are estimated for each profile. The results show that even with small shifts in the speed distribution the differ-ences on the sustainability indicators are significant. Therefore, the operational profile needs to be considered in the early design phases when the synthesis of the energy systems takes place, in order to achieve significant improvement on the systems environmental and economic sustainability performance

[1]  Rosemary Norman,et al.  Multi-objective design of a hybrid propulsion system for marine vessels , 2012 .

[2]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Ship speed optimization: Concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios , 2014 .

[3]  Milojka Počuča Methodology of Day-to-Day Ship Costs Assessment , 2006 .

[4]  D. W. Jones,et al.  The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships , 1989 .

[5]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  Improving ship energy efficiency through a systems perspective , 2013 .

[6]  R. Dupuis,et al.  Dynamic Analysis: Sail the Ship Before It's Built , 1997 .

[7]  Victor N. Armstrong Vessel optimisation for low carbon shipping , 2013 .

[8]  Michael R. Motley,et al.  Integrated probabilistic design of marine propulsors to minimize lifetime fuel consumption , 2012 .

[9]  Habin Lee,et al.  Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: A review and future directions , 2015 .

[10]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  Modelling, analysis and optimisation of ship energy systems , 2016 .

[11]  Evangelos Boulougouris,et al.  Voyage optimisation: prediction of ship specific fuel consumption for energy efficient shipping , 2013 .

[12]  Atilla Incecik,et al.  Understanding ship operating profiles with an aim to improve energy efficient ship operations , 2013 .

[13]  Chee-Chong Teo,et al.  Integrated hedging and network planning for container shipping's bunker fuel management , 2013 .

[14]  Jawad Khan,et al.  Machinery Options for Green Ship , 2015 .

[15]  Gerasimos Theotokatos,et al.  Techno-economic investigation of alternative propulsion plants for Ferries and RoRo ships , 2014 .

[16]  Gerasimos Theotokatos,et al.  A decision support system for the development of voyage and maintenance plans for ships , 2015 .

[17]  Basic Principles of Ship Propulsion , 2011 .

[18]  J. Corbett,et al.  Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Shipping , 2010 .

[19]  Atilla Incecik,et al.  A semi-empirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping , 2015 .

[20]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of ship energy systems - the case study of a chemical tanker , 2015 .

[21]  Anders Ulfvarson,et al.  Environmental Improvements in Ship Design by the Use of Scoring Functions , 2006 .

[22]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  The influence of propulsion system design on the carbon footprint of different marine fuels , 2013 .