The psychological process of translating semantic into syntactic structures has dynamic properties such as the following. (1) The speaker is able to start pronouncing an utterance before having worked out the semantic content he wishes to express. Selection of semantic content and construction of syntactic form proceed partially in parallel. (2) The human sentence generator takes as input not only a specification of semantic content but also some indication of desired syntactic shape. Such indications, if present, do not complicate the generation process but make it easier. (3) Certain regularities of speech errors suggest a two-stage generation process. Stage I constructs the “syntactic skeleton” of an utterance; stage II provides the skeleton with morpho-phonological information. An outline is given of the type of grammar which is used by a sentence generation system embodying these characteristics. The system is being implemented on a computer.
[1]
James R. Lindsley.
Producing simple utterances: How far ahead do we plan?
,
1975,
Cognitive Psychology.
[2]
Roger C. Schank,et al.
Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding
,
1972
.
[3]
Gerard Kempen.
Sentence Construction by a Psychologically Plausible Formulator
,
1978
.
[4]
Brian Butterworth,et al.
Gesture and Silence as Indicators of Planning in Speech
,
1978
.
[5]
M. F. Garrett,et al.
The Analysis of Sentence Production1
,
1975
.
[6]
Gerard Kempen,et al.
Conceptualizing and formulating in sentence production
,
1977
.
[7]
Richard Hudson,et al.
Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar
,
1976
.
[8]
James R. Lindsley.
Producing simple utterances: Details of the planning process
,
1976
.
[9]
G. Kempen.
Man's sentence generator: Aspects of its control structure
,
1977
.