Protein–Protein Binding Free Energy Predictions with the MM/PBSA Approach Complemented with the Gaussian-Based Method for Entropy Estimation

Here, we present a Gaussian-based method for estimation of protein–protein binding entropy to augment the molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method for computational prediction of binding free energy (ΔG). The method is termed f5-MM/PBSA/E, where “E” stands for entropy and f5 for five adjustable parameters. The enthalpy components of ΔG (molecular mechanics, polar and non-polar solvation energies) are computed from a single implicit solvent generalized Born (GB) energy minimized structure of a protein–protein complex, while the binding entropy is computed using independently GB energy minimized unbound and bound structures. It should be emphasized that the f5-MM/PBSA/E method does not use snapshots, just energy minimized structures, and is thus very fast and computationally efficient. The method is trained and benchmarked in 5-fold validation test over a data set consisting of 46 protein–protein binding cases with experimentally determined dissociation constant Kd values. This data set has been used for benchmarking in recently published protein–protein binding studies that apply conventional MM/PBSA and MM/PBSA with an enhanced sampling method. The f5-MM/PBSA/E tested on the same data set achieves similar or better performance than these computationally demanding approaches, making it an excellent choice for high throughput protein–protein binding affinity prediction studies.

[1]  Yan-jing Sheng,et al.  Improving the Performance of MM/PBSA in Protein-Protein Interactions via the Screening Electrostatic Energy , 2021, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Luciano A. Abriata,et al.  Assessment of transferable forcefields for protein simulations attests improved description of disordered states and secondary structure propensities, and hints at multi-protein systems as the next challenge for optimization , 2021, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[3]  Wajid Arshad Abbasi,et al.  ISLAND: in-silico proteins binding affinity prediction using sequence information , 2020, BioData Mining.

[4]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  RCSB Protein Data Bank: powerful new tools for exploring 3D structures of biological macromolecules for basic and applied research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology, bioengineering and energy sciences , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Shailesh Kumar Panday,et al.  Application and Comprehensive Analysis of Neighbor Approximated Information Theoretic Configurational Entropy Methods to Protein-Ligand Binding Cases. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[6]  Rongsheng Tong,et al.  Recent advances in the development of protein–protein interactions modulators: mechanisms and clinical trials , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[7]  Arghya Chakravorty,et al.  Entropy of Proteins Using Multiscale Cell Correlation , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  D. Herschlag,et al.  How to measure and evaluate binding affinities , 2020, eLife.

[9]  Shan Zhao,et al.  Capturing the Effects of Explicit Waters in Implicit Electrostatics Modeling: Qualitative Justification of Gaussian-Based Dielectric Models in DelPhi , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities , 2019, WIREs Computational Molecular Science.

[11]  Huiyong Sun,et al.  Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[12]  Emil Alexov,et al.  DelPhi Suite: New Developments and Review of Functionalities , 2019, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  E. Alexov,et al.  A super-Gaussian Poisson–Boltzmann model for electrostatic free energy calculation: smooth dielectric distribution for protein cavities and in both water and vacuum states , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[14]  E. Alexov,et al.  A super-Gaussian Poisson–Boltzmann model for electrostatic free energy calculation: smooth dielectric distribution for protein cavities and in both water and vacuum states , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[15]  T. Robak,et al.  Venetoclax in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2019, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[16]  Federico Cappuzzo,et al.  Atezolizumab for First‐Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Arnaud Boyer,et al.  Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[18]  E. Alexov,et al.  Gaussian-Based Smooth Dielectric Function: A Surface-Free Approach for Modeling Macromolecular Binding in Solvents , 2018, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[19]  Lin Li,et al.  Reproducing the Ensemble Average Polar Solvation Energy of a Protein from a Single Structure: Gaussian-Based Smooth Dielectric Function for Macromolecular Modeling. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[20]  J. Fernández-Recio,et al.  Hot-spot analysis for drug discovery targeting protein-protein interactions , 2018, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[21]  F. Morabito,et al.  Venetoclax for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2017, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[22]  Lin Li,et al.  Treating ion distribution with Gaussian‐based smooth dielectric function in DelPhi , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Sherlyn Jemimah,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: scoring schemes and binding affinity. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  J. H. Zhang,et al.  Interaction entropy for protein-protein binding. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Dan Li,et al.  Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  Yi Pan,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: detection, reliability assessment and applications , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..

[28]  Mi Zhou,et al.  Current Experimental Methods for Characterizing Protein–Protein Interactions , 2016, ChemMedChem.

[29]  C. Rudin,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  R. Sharan,et al.  Human protein interaction networks across tissues and diseases , 2015, Front. Genet..

[31]  C. Simmerling,et al.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Anna Vangone,et al.  Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein–protein complexes , 2015, eLife.

[33]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[34]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  Protein-protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence , 2014, Bioinform..

[35]  K. Lage Protein-protein interactions and genetic diseases: The interactome. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[36]  G. Folkers,et al.  Proteins feel more than they see: fine-tuning of binding affinity by properties of the non-interacting surface. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Wenling Li,et al.  A functional feature analysis on diverse protein–protein interactions: application for the prediction of binding affinity , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[38]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity? , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[39]  A. Emili,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks: probing disease mechanisms using model systems , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[40]  Carlos Simmerling,et al.  Improved Generalized Born Solvent Model Parameters for Protein Simulations. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[41]  Lin Li,et al.  On the Dielectric “Constant” of Proteins: Smooth Dielectric Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Its Implementation in DelPhi , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[42]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side-chain rotamer changes upon ligand binding: common, crucial, correlate with entropy and rearrange hydrogen bonding , 2012, Bioinform..

[43]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Develop and Test a Solvent Accessible Surface Area-Based Model in Conformational Entropy Calculations , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[44]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Efficient calculation of molecular configurational entropies using an information theoretic approximation. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[45]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[46]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. , 2011, Structure.

[47]  Z. Weng,et al.  A structure‐based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinity , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  P. Kastritis,et al.  Erratum: Are scoring functions in protein - Protein Docking Ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark (Journal of Proteome Research (2010) 9 (2216-2225) , 2011 .

[49]  Alexander McPherson,et al.  Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology , 2010, Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology.

[50]  P. Kastritis,et al.  Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[51]  K. Dill,et al.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get". , 2009, Structure.

[52]  Andrew D Westwell,et al.  Protein–protein interactions as targets for small-molecule therapeutics in cancer , 2008, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[53]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Extraction of configurational entropy from molecular simulations via an expansion approximation. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[54]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[55]  T. Creamer,et al.  Side‐chain entropy effects on protein secondary structure formation , 2005, Proteins.

[56]  David A. Price,et al.  Maraviroc (UK-427,857), a Potent, Orally Bioavailable, and Selective Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Chemokine Receptor CCR5 with Broad-Spectrum Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Activity , 2005, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[57]  J. Matthews,et al.  Protein-protein interactions in human disease. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[58]  G Schreiber,et al.  Electrostatically optimized Ras-binding Ral guanine dissociation stimulator mutants increase the rate of association by stabilizing the encounter complex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[60]  Chuang Liu Approximations, Idealizations, and Models in Statistical Mechanics , 2004 .

[61]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[62]  J. Åqvist,et al.  The linear interaction energy method for predicting ligand binding free energies. , 2001, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[63]  G Schreiber,et al.  New Structural and Functional Aspects of the Type I Interferon-Receptor Interaction Revealed by Comprehensive Mutational Analysis of the Binding Interface* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  G Schreiber,et al.  Mutational and structural analysis of the binding interface between type I interferons and their receptor Ifnar2. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[65]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[66]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[67]  A. Fersht,et al.  Contribution of residues in the reactive site loop of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 to protein stability and activity. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[68]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  FREE ENERGY CALCULATIONS : APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 1993 .

[69]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Modeling electrostatics in molecular biology: A tutorial of DelPhi and associated resources [Article v1.0] , 2019, Living Journal of Computational Molecular Science.

[70]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Reproducing ensemble averaged electrostatics with Super-Gaussian-based smooth dielectric function: application to electrostatic component of binding energy of protein complexes , 2019, Commun. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Juan Fernández-Recio,et al.  CCharPPI web server: computational characterization of protein-protein interactions from structure , 2015, Bioinform..

[72]  Dimas Suárez,et al.  Direct methods for computing single‐molecule entropies from molecular simulations , 2015 .

[73]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Generalized Born model with a simple, robust molecular volume correction. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[74]  Richard H. Henchman,et al.  Revisiting free energy calculations: a theoretical connection to MM/PBSA and direct calculation of the association free energy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[75]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[76]  D. Case,et al.  Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects. , 2000, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[77]  A. Fersht,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interactions by mutagenesis: direct versus indirect effects. , 1999, Protein engineering.