Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of genomic selection in single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) when the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix (G) is derived by the "algorithm for proven and young animals" (APY). This algorithm implements genomic recursions on a subset of "proven" animals. Only a relationship matrix for animals treated as "proven" needs to be inverted, and the extra costs of adding animals treated as "young" are linear. Analyses involved 10,102,702 final scores on 6,930,618 Holstein cows. Final score, which is a composite of type traits, is popular trait in the United States and was easily available for this study. A total of 100,000 animals with genotypes were used in the analyses and included 23,000 sires (16,000 with >5 progeny), 27,000 cows, and 50,000 young animals. Genomic EBV (GEBV) were calculated with a regular inverse of G, and with the G inverse approximated by APY. Animals in the proven subset included only sires (23,000), sires+cows (50,000), only cows (27,000), or sires with >5 progeny (16,000). The correlations of GEBV with APY and regular GEBV for young genotyped animals were 0.994, 0.995, 0.992, and 0.992, respectively Later, animals in the proven subset were randomly sampled from all genotyped animals in sets of 2,000, 5,000, 10,000, 15,000, and 20,000; each sample was replicated 4 times. Respective correlations were 0.97 (5,000 sample), 0.98 (10,000 sample), and 0.99 (20,000 sample), with minimal difference between samples of the same size. Genomic EBV with APY were accurate when the number of animals used in the subset is between 10,000 and 20,000, with little difference between the ways of creating the subset. Due to the approximately linear cost of APY, ssGBLUP with APY could support any number of genotyped animals without affecting accuracy.

[1]  Paul M VanRaden,et al.  Measuring Genomic Pre-Selection in Theory and in Practice , 2013 .

[2]  A Legarra,et al.  Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Rohan L Fernando,et al.  A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  I Misztal,et al.  Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  R. L. Quaas,et al.  Additive Genetic Model with Groups and Relationships , 1988 .

[6]  J. Woolliams,et al.  The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods , 2010, Genetics.

[7]  I Misztal,et al.  Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  Single Step, a general approach for genomic selection , 2014 .

[9]  I Misztal,et al.  Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[11]  Z Liu,et al.  A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  I Misztal,et al.  Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[13]  C. R. Henderson A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values , 1976 .

[14]  A. Stella,et al.  Use of different statistical models to predict direct genomic values for productive and functional traits in Italian Holsteins. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[15]  I Misztal,et al.  Analysis of age-specific predicted transmitting abilities for final scores in Holsteins with a random regression model. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Ismo Strandén,et al.  Comparison of Some Equivalent Equations to Solve Single-Step GBLUP , 2014 .

[17]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  Genetic Evaluation using Unsymmetric Single Step Genomic Methodology with Large Number of Genotypes , 2013 .

[18]  B. Fragomeni Use of Genomic Recursions and Algorithm for Proven and Young Animals for Single-Step Genomic BLUP Analyses with a Large Number of Genotypes , 2014 .

[19]  I Misztal,et al.  Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. , 2011, Genetics research.

[20]  I. Misztal,et al.  A recursive algorithm for decomposition and creation of the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.